Iran sells oil in yen for Japan

Quote from dhpar:

lol. why does us go to iraq then? to promote democracy? to save iraqi people from saddam's tyranny? to take away from him wmds?
get real. the only reason is an energy security of us. if us does not have an easy access to middle eastern oil it would have a significant impact on us geopolitical and economic status. and only as long as us is the superpower in these two areas the oil is going to be priced in usd - which is a huge advantage for us.
why do you think some countries were against the invasion in the first place? to save iraqi people? c'mon - it is not that subtle after all.

by the way us is not trying to prevent iran doing business in usd - it tries to prevent them to do any business. the fact that they do it in different currencies pisses them off. and be sure other (big) countries will never accept any pressure from us on foreigner banks exactly because of above...

next time tell us something more interesting...are you czech by the way?


Clearly you don't understand the oil markets. The volume of oil imported from Iraq into the US is a drop in the bucket compared to Canada, Saudi Arabia, Mexico and Venezuela, in that order.
 
thanks for a compliment. Looking at the map Saudi Arabia is Middle East - or maybe am I getting old...? Maybe you are forgetting that Saddam did not exactly love House of Saud...?

Agree that Canada is the most important - but it is irrelevant from energy security perspective because it is SAFE. Mexico basically too. Venezuela not very friendly but they have a very sour oil which only US refineries can eat - so it is not that big security issue after all.

It is a marginal production that matters - and this is ruled by countries that are not safe (or may become unsafe) by definition.

:cool: ever thinking about changing your name?
 
next time tell us something more interesting...are you czech by the way?
Well you need more interesting subject then.Not worn-out non-sense about how Iranians are gonna hurt the U.S.. Your response is off the subject anyway.
I am Czech.
 
well you decided to participate in the thread in the first place. i would expect that you had something to say - i was wrong.
anyway I like czechs. :)
 
Quote from Cesko:

Pekelo how many sentences of the article you've actually read. 2 or 3 at most, I guess.

I think I read 4 or so...

This is nothing new on Iran's part, they have been thinking about this for at least 5 years. And why is it anti-american to objectively asses a situation??

As an endnote, Halliburton was doing busioness with them despite the sanctions....

Now to keep the thread on topic, Iran is going to be less and less of a major oil exporter. Currently they are producing 4 mbd oil and using 1.5 of it, but this ratio is going to grow to the disadvantage of exports and in 5-10 years Iran won't be able to export anything if the current trend stays the same...
 
Nowadays they can't even develop capacity needed to refine enough oil for their own consumption[/B]

This seems to be a pattern in the ME, Iraq was a net importer of food and Iran imports gasoline....
 
This is nothing new on Iran's part, they have been thinking about this for at least 5 years. And why is it anti-american to objectively asses a situation??

Because of this:
Yeah, the correct translation of the Iranian nukes is: Tehran oilbourse. For some strange reasons (technical difficulties my ass) it still hasn't opened....

I don't believe Americans get worked up over "potential" Tehran oil exchange. Do you know how hard it is to "steal" liquidity from established players??? Besides bunch of other things like political, economical situation in Iran etc. Is it objective to say Americans are trying to harm Iran economically Iran because the "potential" oil exchange? Not at all,IMO.
I agree with quotes in your first post so I am not alone thinking along these lines.
I think I am objective because despite whatever I said, personally I don't agree Americans should bother with Iran anyway.

P.S. Regarding your trading posts I have yet to see one to disagree about.
 
Quote from dhpar:

well you decided to participate in the thread in the first place. i would expect that you had something to say - i was wrong.
anyway I like czechs. :)

Well you decided to participate in responding to my posts which say nothing. I would expect you to give me an argument but instead you decided to go off topic so you can attack me. I guess you might like Czechs but you definitely don't like my opinions.
Anyway I like you too wherever you are from. I just checked and found out I was correct assuming you were British.Why I don't know.
 
Quote from Cesko:

Well you decided to participate in responding to my posts which say nothing. I would expect you to give me an argument but instead you decided to go off topic so you can attack me. I guess you might like Czechs but you definitely don't like my opinions.
Anyway I like you too wherever you are from. I just checked and found out I was correct assuming you were British.Why I don't know.

I am sorry you feel that way - it was certainly not meant like that.

Quote from Cesko:

I don't believe Americans get worked up over "potential" Tehran oil exchange. Do you know how hard it is to "steal" liquidity from established players??? Besides bunch of other things like political, economical situation in Iran etc. Is it objective to say Americans are trying to harm Iran economically Iran because the "potential" oil exchange? Not at all,IMO.

yep. I think it is wrong to say it is about oilbourse. of course it is about nukes. with nukes the energy security in middle east is endangered in the eyes of current administration (to say the least). the same was true about saddam.
 
Quote from Cesko:

I don't believe Americans get worked up over "potential" Tehran oil exchange.

Americans don't, the US government, yes. There is a huge difference.

The last guy who switched (Saddam) got ran over. The US government won't allow that major players in the oilbusiness would use anything but dollars...
 
Back
Top