The information may have been determined to be credible, and the report does talk about concerns, but the concerns are not the credible information. The concerns are the opinions of the authors of the report. We need to keep that in context because mixing credible information with what amounts to comments by the report's author(s) becomes dangerous. It gives those comments an authority they were never meant to have.
Given that their doors are open, unlike other countries who do not feel the need to sign the treaty, I'll continue to give them the benefit of the doubt. If they shut their doors then we'll know something is up. Protocols change and get added all the time so it is possible a new protocol was added and at the time you are referencing, Iran had not yet complied. If they were truly in egregious violation then we would have all the justification we'd need....right?
