Iran is two months away from nuclear bomb

[gwb-trading]

Earlier I warned that either the U.S. could take action against Iran -- or leave it to Israel to take action against Iran. Conflict is inevitable, it is just a question of who would you want to see in the forefront of the conflict. Just note that Israel's solution likely involves mushroom clouds -- and they are telling the world that others must come up with a Plan B to avoid direct conflict between Israel & Iran.

Iran is two months away from having The Bomb, and we are not ruling out military action...

Gantz: Iran is two months away from nuclear bomb
"The international community must build a viable ‘Plan B’ in order to stop Iran in its tracks towards a nuclear weapon," Defense Minister Gantz said.
https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/gantz-iran-is-two-months-away-from-nuclear-bomb-677672

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

Meanwhile, Joe Biden is two weeks away from a bowel movement.

 

[gwb-trading]

Meanwhile, Joe Biden is two weeks away from a bowel movement.

 

[Nine_Ender]

Earlier I warned that either the U.S. could take action against Iran -- or leave it to Israel to take action against Iran. Conflict is inevitable, it is just a question of who would you want to see in the forefront of the conflict. Just note that Israel's solution likely involves mushroom clouds -- and they are telling the world that others must come up with a Plan B to avoid direct conflict between Israel & Iran.

Iran is two months away from having The Bomb, and we are not ruling out military action...

Gantz: Iran is two months away from nuclear bomb
"The international community must build a viable ‘Plan B’ in order to stop Iran in its tracks towards a nuclear weapon," Defense Minister Gantz said.
https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/gantz-iran-is-two-months-away-from-nuclear-bomb-677672

It's invalid to think you have any right to exercise military action on Iran because they have nuclear capability. If Israel gets out of line well they should be stopped in their tracks. War hawks of any type have to be stopped. You are either part of the problem or the solution.

 

[gwb-trading]

It's invalid to think you have any right to exercise military action on Iran because they have nuclear capability. If Israel gets out of line well they should be stopped in their tracks. War hawks of any type have to be stopped. You are either part of the problem or the solution.

So what is your solution for Iran waging a proxy war against just about every nation in the region and supporting terrorism worldwide -- all the while they are engaged in creating nuclear weapons?

Keep in mind that Israel is saying "if the world does not step up and fix this, we will".

 

[Nine_Ender]

So what is your solution for Iran waging a proxy war against just about every nation in the region and supporting terrorism worldwide -- all the while they are engaged in creating nuclear weapons?

Keep in mind that Israel is saying "if the world does not step up and fix this, we will".

They aren't. You Americans often dream up a lot of phony reasons to get involved in other countries business. What I'm saying is a country obtaining nuclear capability is not a legit reason to attack a country; speculating that they have is an even worse reason ( eg like claiming Iraq had WMDs ). Are the nuclear weapons in the US meant to protect the US or wage wars with other countries ? Iran has just as much right to defend itself as the US does in whatever method they choose.

 

[Cuddles]

this reads like another yellow cake/drone striking Arab tankers story

 

[Wallet]

Iran’s ME neighbors don’t want a nuclear armed Iran. On top they’ve vowed to “wipe Israel from the map”.

Iran w/nukes is a definite step backwards for peace in the Middle East.

 

[jem]

So you say its good policy to let terrorist states acquire nuclear weapons?

You don't think Iraq had WMDs even though they had used them against Iran?

Wow.... are you nuts.


https://www.historytoday.com/what-did-happen-saddam’s-wmd

Saddam Hussein certainly had chemical weapons during the Iran-Iraq War of 1980-88, yet by the time American and British troops entered the country in 2003 they were gone. Where?

They aren't. You Americans often dream up a lot of phony reasons to get involved in other countries business. What I'm saying is a country obtaining nuclear capability is not a legit reason to attack a country; speculating that they have is an even worse reason ( eg like claiming Iraq had WMDs ). Are the nuclear weapons in the US meant to protect the US or wage wars with other countries ? Iran has just as much right to defend itself as the US does in whatever method they choose.

 

[Nine_Ender]

So you say its good policy to let terrorist states acquire nuclear weapons?

You don't think Iraq had WMDs even though they had used them against Iran?

Wow.... are you nuts.


https://www.historytoday.com/what-did-happen-saddam’s-wmd

Saddam Hussein certainly had chemical weapons during the Iran-Iraq War of 1980-88, yet by the time American and British troops entered the country in 2003 they were gone. Where?

Not surprising that a nut like you thinks Iraq had WMDs even though they never found any. I suppose it's par for the course that you'd reclassify weapons to match your personal politics. Iran is a country not a terrorist state; I realize some of you Americans struggle with that concept. It's not good policy that any country has nuclear weapons, including the US. You guys are in a small minority of countries that entered into multiple unnecessary wars mostly on flawed or false pretenses. Which of course is why the world doesn't fully trust you any more.