maestro
The one test that got me puzzled for a while is this sequence:
61, 52, 63, 94, 46 , ?, ? put two missing numbers in this sequence.
This test was optional after you have reached IQ >= 150.
Enjoy.
Seems to me that the solution as given is incorrect.
If you say the last number is 1 following your manipulation of digits (not numbers )then you have unconventionally dropped two zeros.
If you say the last number is 001 then you have not conventionally written the 1.
What you described is not a series of conventional numbers but rather a series of paired digit combinations.
If you had rather asked "How can I determine the last two numbers?" after giving them. It would have been a more correct question. I my opinion.
I don't think I.Q. level directly relates to trading success. For my old sake I hope that anywhere within 1 standard deviation should be sufficient.
In my old age I tend to ramble. Please forgive me..
The one test that got me puzzled for a while is this sequence:
61, 52, 63, 94, 46 , ?, ? put two missing numbers in this sequence.
This test was optional after you have reached IQ >= 150.
Enjoy.
Seems to me that the solution as given is incorrect.
If you say the last number is 1 following your manipulation of digits (not numbers )then you have unconventionally dropped two zeros.
If you say the last number is 001 then you have not conventionally written the 1.
What you described is not a series of conventional numbers but rather a series of paired digit combinations.
If you had rather asked "How can I determine the last two numbers?" after giving them. It would have been a more correct question. I my opinion.
I don't think I.Q. level directly relates to trading success. For my old sake I hope that anywhere within 1 standard deviation should be sufficient.
In my old age I tend to ramble. Please forgive me..