g8novice - you're welcome. Anything I can do to keep someone from making the same mistake I made, I'm happy to do.
DoxazoAdonai - I hope you're just trying to refresh your memory, and not considering taking advanced courses. There is a quite complex analysis here from Grob109:
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=60624&perpage=6&pagenumber=4
If you just took the course, and are reading this and regreting paying for it, I encourage you to file a dispute with your credit card company. Do it in writing, mail it return receipt requested, and include this posting with it:
http://joecit.com/2007/03/13/response-to-investools-inc-post/#comments - the parts from Brad Moore, the former instructor. If everyone who feels defrauded by Investools does this, the credit card companies will see that there is a serious credibility/customer service/honesty problem with this company, and may cut off their ability to accept credit cards.
The three "green" indicators to buy a stock are:
The current price crossing above the moving average (I think the moving average is somewhere between 15 days and 30 days)
Stochastics going up, but not above 75 or 80%; preferably starting from below 20 or 25% (I forget whether the band was 20%/80%, or 25%/75%); a "ghost green" is when the line has not gone below the lower limit of the band, but is now going up.
MACD (Moving Average Convergence/Divergence) crossing above the zero line (and going up); compares a short term moving average (7 days?) to a longer term moving average (30 days?); the idea is that the price is going up when the shorter term moving average is higher than the longer term moving average. (Unfortunately, I think I figured out that it doesn't really mean anything - the price of the stock is not terribly predictable by this.)
In addition, they like to have volume 1.5 times average.
Oh, and the "news" should not be negative - they say they don't care about news unless it is negative (but sure didn't tell me what negative was - and then there was the hotline phone call where I was told I lost money on the paper trade because there was no POSITIVE news - go figure!).
And theoretically, the stock should pass Fundamental analysis, but, like Grob109, the stock used to demonstrate the method in my Basic Stocks seminar, Google, did not show up on any of the fundamental searches I did in the "test" period between being sold the "test period" at a Get Motivated! seminar, and the Basic Stocks seminar. As a matter of fact, it NEVER showed up on a search for the required fundamentals.
By the way, I am curious if anyone else can find this glitch in the system, if they still have Investools access. I noticed once that, on the Interactive chart, well after the market for the day had closed, the data on the line below the stock name (the closing price, high and low prices, and the volume for the day) was correct for the day (it matched other free sites, like MSN Money or Yahoo Finance), but the last point on the chart was actually the data from the day before. This was quite a while after the market had closed (3-4 hours, at least), and if they had the closing data for the line below the name, which includes high and low for the day, why wouldn't they have the correct data on the chart?
This glitch is one of the reasons I decided I couldn't continue with the web site - since they teach short term chart trading, and you are waiting for that last data point, if you don't see that data point on the day you should, you're going to miss entering at the correct time. I put this on my letter disputing the charges, and their reply was basically "I hope you understand we get the best data feeds there are" - no mention of the fact that how their software interprets the feeds makes a difference.
And the only reason I noticed this is that I had put together an Excel spreadsheet which included the day's volume (to determine if it was 1.5 times average), and was re-checking the volume I had entered for a stock, and it was different! I finally tracked it down to the difference between the data in the line below the stock's symbol and name, and the data shown when you hover the vertical red line over the last data point.
Anyway, if anyone finds this anomaly, I'd appreciate it if they could take a screen shot of it (press Ctrl and then the PrtScn button, then paste the bitmap into a Word processing document, or into Microsoft Paint - under Accessories) and send it to me via e-mail or private message through this bulletin board. It needs to show the vertical red line that lets you see the detail of the stats - the price and the volume, I think, as well as that the data for the last point on the chart does not match the data under the stock's name.
If anyone else can find this and document it, I'd be really grateful!