I heard from an FX trader that they can trade up to 1000 lots or $100mm unlevered and they cannot make than more $3 to $4 million losses (below zero). And they get only 3% to 5% of all profits from that. So that would result in something like $90k risk capital for the beginner trader up to $200k risk capital. Is that true ? Not more for better traders or only the very rare exceptions in a bank ?
So basically a $2 million funded account with a prop firm where you get 80% profit split and you can have 10% max. drawdown (below zero) = $200k risk capital.
And the best thing you can trade on your own PA (personal accounts) like you wish on a prop firm. You cannot do in a Bank. You need to hold at least for 4 weeks a profitable trade.
So why then choose the trader in a bank position when you need to study first (a lot of garbage or non-trading related stuff) and nowadays having much prop activities is also not wanted in a bank ?
One other question. Could you scale a lot in a bank ? Never heard that. So you make $5 million profit and then you trade $500 million positions ? Not allowed or is it ? (because additional scaling on profits is not allowed in that way on prop firms (that so called retail FX prop firms)).
If you know other trading positions like Equity Derivatives Trader for example, then please say what kind of max. position you can have (as prop position) and profit split after ?
There is usually large overhead in the banks, so on your first million profit you only meet minimum expectation and get no bonus, which makes it worse.
So if you do not need a Bloomberg for trading (prop) only, what are the advantages in terms of risk capital on how much you can make as Trader in a bank ?
Or have been any advantages only in the past existed ? (Before 2008)
So basically a $2 million funded account with a prop firm where you get 80% profit split and you can have 10% max. drawdown (below zero) = $200k risk capital.
And the best thing you can trade on your own PA (personal accounts) like you wish on a prop firm. You cannot do in a Bank. You need to hold at least for 4 weeks a profitable trade.
So why then choose the trader in a bank position when you need to study first (a lot of garbage or non-trading related stuff) and nowadays having much prop activities is also not wanted in a bank ?
One other question. Could you scale a lot in a bank ? Never heard that. So you make $5 million profit and then you trade $500 million positions ? Not allowed or is it ? (because additional scaling on profits is not allowed in that way on prop firms (that so called retail FX prop firms)).
If you know other trading positions like Equity Derivatives Trader for example, then please say what kind of max. position you can have (as prop position) and profit split after ?
There is usually large overhead in the banks, so on your first million profit you only meet minimum expectation and get no bonus, which makes it worse.
So if you do not need a Bloomberg for trading (prop) only, what are the advantages in terms of risk capital on how much you can make as Trader in a bank ?
Or have been any advantages only in the past existed ? (Before 2008)