Investment Advisers Paying Penalties for Advertising False Performance Claims

Press Release

Investment Advisers Paying Penalties for Advertising False Performance Claims
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
2016-167
Washington D.C., Aug. 25, 2016
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced penalties against 13 investment advisory firms found to have violated securities laws by spreading the false claims made by an investment management firm about its flagship product.

An SEC enforcement sweep of investment advisers found that the 13 firms accepted and negligently relied upon claims by F-Squared Investments that its AlphaSector strategy for investing in exchange-traded funds (ETFs) had outperformed the S&P Index for several years. The firms repeated many of F-Squared’s claims while recommending the investment to their own clients without obtaining sufficient documentation to substantiate the information being advertised. F-Squared later admitted in an SEC enforcement case that what was purportedly its real, historical track record was only back-tested performance that turned out to be substantially inflated.

The penalties assessed against the firms range from $100,000 to a half-million dollars based upon the fees each firm earned from AlphaSector-related strategies.

“When an investment adviser echoes another firm’s performance claims in its own advertisements, it must verify the information first rather than merely accept it as fact,” said Andrew J. Ceresney, Director of the SEC Enforcement Division. “These advisers negligently passed many of F-Squared’s claims onto their own clients, who were consequently relying upon false and misleading information when making investment decisions.”

Anthony S. Kelly, Co-Chief of the SEC Enforcement Division’s Asset Management Unit, added, “The Asset Management Unit continues to investigate and pursue similar enforcement actions against other advisers that potentially misled investors and others with advertisements containing F-Squared’s false historical performance data.”

Without admitting or denying the findings, the 13 investment advisers consented to the entry of orders finding that they violated Sections 204 and 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Rules 204-2(a)(16) and 206(4)-1(a)(5).

The SEC’s investigations have been conducted by Robert Baker, William Donahue, John Farinacci, Jeffrey Finnell, Corey Schuster, Naomi Sevilla, Rory Alex, Marc Jones, Alicia Reed, and Sonia Torrico.

* * *

SEC Orders and Penalties

AssetMark – $500,000

BB&T Securities – $200,000

Banyan Partners – $200,000

Congress Wealth Management – $100,000

Constellation Wealth Advisors – $100,000

Executive Monetary Management – $100,000

HT Partners – $100,000

Hilliard Lyons – $200,000

Ladenburg Thalmann Asset Management – $200,000

Prospera Financial Services – $100,000

Risk Paradigm Group – $100,000

Schneider Downs Wealth Management Advisors – $100,000

Shamrock Asset Management – $200,000
 
Incredible. Haven't these guys ever heard of a simple strategy which doesn't require any backtesting or algorithms? It's called "buy the dip" lol!

The investment advisors paid a small fine for their blind reliance on F-Squared results, however it seems F-Squared was the one faking the numbers, and hence paid the most fines.

"F-Squared acknowledged that its conduct violated federal securities laws, and agreed to cease and desist from committing or causing violations of these provisions. F-Squared agreed to retain an independent compliance consultant and pay disgorgement of $30 million and a penalty of $5 million."
 
Last edited:

http://fortune.com/2014/12/22/wall-street-sec-fsquared/

In the summer of 2007, after his sophomore year at college, Hoffstein had interned for Morton, his father’s broker. Hoffstein was struck by the fact that fund managers were often locked into their strategies no matter what was happening around them. Back at college, Hoffstein, who had been programming since he was 14, decided that he would design his own trading algorithm. Hoffstein’s model for timing the market, the one that later became the basis for F-Squared’s investment product, is something he calls momentum plus volatility, or “dynamic momentum.” Generally the idea is to buy stocks—or, through ETFs, market sectors—that have been going up and doing so steadily, and stay away from those that are more volatile. Based on historical data, it appeared to work quite well. When Hoffstein returned as an intern for Morton in 2008, he showed Morton the program, and the financial adviser was blown away. Morton introduced Hoffstein to Rosedale, a lawyer he knew, and eventually to Present. By the end of the summer Hoffstein, Morton, and Rosedale had formed a new company and made a deal with Present. Hoffstein headed back to college at Cornell and eventually to grad school at Carnegie Mellon, where he earned a master’s degree in computational finance.

invb-01-15.jpg





http://fortune.com/2014/12/22/sec-f-squared-fraud/

F-Squared is the most successful of a number of firms that call themselves tactical ETF managers. These companies advise clients on when to buy and sell ETFs, generally based on sophisticated computer models. Nearly $100 billion has flowed into such firms since the financial crisis. F-Squared is the largest of the lot, attracting over $28 billion.

... ...

In the fall of 2008, F-Squared began to market this strategy to potential clients. But instead of openly stating that the strategy’s potential performance had been calculated in 2008, Present said F-Squared’s track record was based on actual investment history. A press release from the firm said that $100 million in client assets had been devoted to the strategy since 2001. In fact, the actual amount was zero.

What’s more, according to the SEC, shortly after Present started touting his strategy, the analyst who had helped create the track record informed Present that they had made a mistake in their calculations. They had developed the model’s hypothetical performance by applying buy and sell recommendations a week before the model would have actually made those suggestions, enabling the model to buy an ETF just before the price rose and sell just before it dropped. Because of the error, F-Squared’s calculations showed that the strategy had returned 135% during the period. In fact, the strategy’s hypothetical performance should have been 38%. The SEC alleges that Present never investigated the error.


 
Last edited:
Back
Top