If you sat with me for a day and watched how I use it realtime (with my trade entry criteria) then it would make more sense to you imo. There are aspects of what I do that I do not mention, so if all seen together it would seem more complete I would think.Quote from manlycure:
The CD, as anyone using a tool that tracks it (I/RT, Ninja/GomCD, etc.) can judge for herself, IMHO is NOT a reliable indicator, at least not by itself, or should I say, at least not in its simplified form when you try to detect divergence with price action. Now someone needs to write a book about how to make money with CD and that will seal the deal on the self-destruction of this indicator. Who said the market is not efficient?
D.
BTW I'm still using CD... just not trusting it wholesale.
Would this be "typical" behavior or is there no connection and you view these 2 zones as being independent?Quote from AMT4SWA:
If you sat with me for a day and watched how I use it realtime (with my trade entry criteria) then it would make more sense to you imo. There are aspects of what I do that I do not mention, so if all seen together it would seem more complete I would think.
Yes they did seem to work the area hard just below those higher levels of resting inventory.....not totally uncommon. If the 924-927 delta zone gets busted out, the market should have one heck of a nice run......940 holders would probably just get out of the way.Quote from chuckt101:
AMT, do you feel 940 short inventory has shown their hand early by the strong reaction 10+pts before their zone? In other words, if/when 940 hits, do you expect a 50-100+ pt reaction off of it?Would this be "typical" behavior or is there no connection and you view these 2 zones as being independent?
