Presentiment Effect is the term used to describe anticipatory responses to emotionally significant events prior to the occurrence of the event. The term âPresentimentâ was coined by Dr. Dean Radin to describe the phenomenon he observed in his experiments when a skin-conductance was measured to look for reactions to the series of images that were presented to various subjects. What Dr. Radin and his colleagues found was that a significant incidence of test subjects showed a premonitory ability for visual media that would generate an emotional response. His subjects would be isolated in a room and asked to look at a series of images on a computer screen. The images would be displayed at regular intervals of sixteen seconds (later revised to an acceptable period of time as to ensure the subject had returned to baseline physiology). The images were randomized and included both emotionally significant and insignificant material. As it turned out with the majority of subjects, milliseconds before the image was displayed, both a galvanic skin response and blood flow responses were recorded prior to the image appearing on the screen. This only happened when the image was emotionally significant, with the highest positive result correlating to erotic images.
I have conducted similar experiments using the red and green lights controlled by the real-time e-mini tick-by-tick price movements. The green light would light for about 200 ms if the e-mini price has moved up 2 full ticks (0.5 point) and the red light would go on for the same 200 ms if the price moved down 2 ticks. The subjects were exposed to these lights through their left eye to trigger only the right part of their cortex. The subjects also were not able to see the e-mini chart and were also isolated from any other information flow related to the markets. During the 2 hour experiments subjects were asked to hit the âUâ key on their keyboard if they thought the next light would be green and hit the âDâ key if they thought the next light would be red. The experiments were repeated for several trading days between 9:30 to 11:30 AM EST. Simultaneously with the subjectâs decisions a random generator was used to choose the green or red light to establish a âcontrolâ subject. The correlations between the actual up and down moves of the e-mini price and the anticipated sequences have been calculated as well as the correlations between the randomly chosen lights and their actual occurrence. The average correlation exhibited by the test subjects was in the neighborhood of 31% where the correlation between the actual sequence and randomly chosen one was around 8%. In other words, the subjects had clear BIAS towards the actual tick sequence.
In my later experiments I was able to increase the accuracy using different Intuition Amplification methods. In further posts I will shed more lights on the subject.
I have conducted similar experiments using the red and green lights controlled by the real-time e-mini tick-by-tick price movements. The green light would light for about 200 ms if the e-mini price has moved up 2 full ticks (0.5 point) and the red light would go on for the same 200 ms if the price moved down 2 ticks. The subjects were exposed to these lights through their left eye to trigger only the right part of their cortex. The subjects also were not able to see the e-mini chart and were also isolated from any other information flow related to the markets. During the 2 hour experiments subjects were asked to hit the âUâ key on their keyboard if they thought the next light would be green and hit the âDâ key if they thought the next light would be red. The experiments were repeated for several trading days between 9:30 to 11:30 AM EST. Simultaneously with the subjectâs decisions a random generator was used to choose the green or red light to establish a âcontrolâ subject. The correlations between the actual up and down moves of the e-mini price and the anticipated sequences have been calculated as well as the correlations between the randomly chosen lights and their actual occurrence. The average correlation exhibited by the test subjects was in the neighborhood of 31% where the correlation between the actual sequence and randomly chosen one was around 8%. In other words, the subjects had clear BIAS towards the actual tick sequence.
In my later experiments I was able to increase the accuracy using different Intuition Amplification methods. In further posts I will shed more lights on the subject.