I came across this thread yet again, but but this time from page 1. I did not recognize it, and read. It was a bit deceiving as the dates are changed, I read as the situation implied that you would be in a position to sum of years of work or posts at least.
Admittedly, I only got to the first 2 or 3 posts. from there it became clear that small pictures that don't fill up the screen wont be a trend. I saw the the pages.
I'm not sure how to read the data, but my intuition said to move to the last page where I opened a thesis which had some familiar terms in the index so I closed it.
I tried 2 doors. both led to unknowns and unknowns are known to wast time. I love the sea of data, I cant read it like most and I have to eat. You make me feel like this just may be a good thing.
So I now come to the cumulative he who holds the index and has the research. I don't think a computer can guide me on where the main selling point (for me) would be. Once I have the main selling point I can start to trust my intuition a bit. But I now its limits.
Actually each of those who fail can only blame there intuition.
Hope comes in and leads me down the wrong path, It looks for complex ideas at times, other times it favours simple ideas covers the ext reams. Lucky for me I don't have the resources to make a AI system that models the worlds. I still tried to convince some one to.
Anyways,
I came to the collective or the present to be guided. Here we have the issue of the index. Turns out that the stupid little thing my grade 3 teacher was trying to teach me is what I look for. I found the index a wast of time but as you see, in my writing, the index, date, name and bibliography were the needed points to skim by. It amused me how much free marks were given. French was funny, it was separated one could get a 0 in writing and pass with good marks ! I was getting back negative points on my tests but they did not fit well in to the percent formilea.
So you can see how one can get lost and give up on reading, If not I can go on.
The index, seems to be what I search for. I have learnt that if it is lacking to go to the front. Here is where my things get tricky.
The reason for data or writing to be submitted is not known. In a world where information is power it is questioned.
Yet at the same time, Human nature has its need to connect, information is used to do this. but in this case the index is a negative for the data giver. with the index one can take out only what he or she wants.
This would be a bad thing to the data provider if his intentions were to connect over profit. The issue is amplified when it is learnt that point one to the answer be seen by others,
Not only this, but he may himself give out the index, which would cripple the nice guys intentions.
Now the data provider has a delema, he must hide the answer. demand loyalty, confirm it, and double check it. From there he gives bits and pieces.
Maybe the answer is not even in the thread or data any more.
Enter the multitude of posts vague in nature jumping form here to there referencing valid things and then invalid things are referenced out of regret for being to forward. one starts to keep track. only 1 % of the posts should have answers so in come the 100 posts.
Im not talking about you.
The intuition is almost useless. As soon as one learns the game he can profit off it . If you get taken for a ride and then come to cash register. you know that the marketer being funded will always be a better sales man.
At this point intuition is actually doing the opposite of what it should.
It is easy to market something simple. the provider knows I know this. I conclude that good marketers that be wiser then me will have complex ideas. and bad marketers will have easy idea.
Now I am doing the opposite i ignore the extreams and look in the middle.
Sorry to jump in the thread like this. I know i do it often.
Your first posts were about using intuition to go through data, I thought I would share this to show the Delema, if not for the nice guy, at least to advance the field of marketing
