

Quote from Bob111:
as i said before-when you create your own application for whatever-it gives you most important thing-flexibility. yeah..drag and drop would be nice,but.. idea and writing is actually easy part. SQA is a real pain in a**
want some ready to go solutions? here:
http://www.amazon.com/Professional-...=UTF8&qid=1321324401&sr=1-8#reader_0971853649
page 46-59...good luck with their "system"
hey..there is more:
http://www2.wealth-lab.com/cgi-bin/WealthLab.DLL/editsystem?id=10
Quote from Shanb:
Thanks for the links.
The system I worked on before is performing well, but I need a better way of finding signals. The way I do it now is so ineffecient. Will have to work some way around that. I don't feel like its right to have that not be optimal and start focusing alot on this. I have a tendency to jump around and get too focused on one thing so will have to take care of that before I jump too far into this!
Quote from EEUT84:
3. You are looking for intraday reversion.
Quote from bone:
IMO, you'll make more money and be more consistent modeling for divergence.
And yes, this is an excellent strategy but for higher frequency timeframes the slippage and ECN performance is everything. The really successful groups doing this tend to invest heavily in the infrastructure. Like dedicated lines, servers, very robust software, etc. etc.
Quote from EEUT84:
I could never get the hang of this. I'm guessing you need a driver to start the pair divergence? Why not just trade the single name that is trending due to the driver?
Quote from EEUT84:
I could never get the hang of this. I'm guessing you need a driver to start the pair divergence? Why not just trade the single name that is trending due to the driver?