Quote from WinstonTJ:
Yes, true, pure tick data will be too large even for Excel 2007 (which has a much higher row count per worksheet than 2003).
What I meant by "seeing a trade go away" is that my tick data is very valuable and I don't just give it out to anyone. I don't sell it to anyone because itâs against the terms of my agreement from my data provider - and - if someone does not want to work with me itâs easier/better IMO to walk away from a trade than to start giving out free tick data. By not giving it out it keeps the barrier to entry higher, reducing competition and increasing my edges in the market.
Not trying to be a jerk but if you want real tick data you need to pay to play. I have 3 years of S&P and just about every ETF on the market. Itâs about 700 names total and itâs about 7TB worth of data. To put that in perspective with 1-min bars, you could get probably 20 years of 1-min bars for the entire NYSE and fit it into 3TB or less. 1-min bars don't give you much more than you can already get for free on Yahoo/Google Finance. If you can fit it into an excel spreadsheet or onto a DVD its probably not worth much.
For example, SPY is roughly 80mb per day in an Access database. Yes Access is a large format to keep tick data in but its easy to work with and smaller sections can be pulled into excel quickly. A simpler way to state it is that SPY has roughly 2.5 million ticks per day (in these recent VERY low volume days). An Excel 2007 spreadsheet only has 1,048,576 rows whereas 2003 only has 65,536 rows. You can't fit even one low volume day of SPY into an excel spreadsheet.
Why don't you just record from Google/Yahoo/Finviz (or your broker) for a few days?