Interview of Palin: Judge for Yourself

Intrade should go ahead and put up a new group of contracts in case McSame/Lipstick win. That way we can gauge which war is highest on their priority list once taking office and when it will start. It would look something like this:

MCCAIN.PALIN.WAR.IRAN.DEC09
MCCAIN.PALIN.WAR.RUSSIA.DEC09
MCCAIN.PALIN.WAR.IRAN.DEC10
MCCAIN.PALIN.WAR.RUSSIA.DEC10
MCCAIN.PALIN.WAR.IRAN.DEC11
MCCAIN.PALIN.WAR.RUSSIA.DEC11
MCCAIN.PALIN.WAR.IRAN.DEC12
MCCAIN.PALIN.WAR.RUSSIA.DEC12

Between the two of them we better start digging our fallout shelters pretty soon. Even Cheney and Wolfowitz are cringing right now.
 
Another REALLY stupid asshole here on ET. You tell me where Obama stands on these issues. clueless fuck.
Quote from brocklanders:

Intrade should go ahead and put up a new group of contracts in case McSame/Lipstick win. That way we can gauge which war is highest on their priority list once taking office and when it will start. It would look something like this:

MCCAIN.PALIN.WAR.IRAN.DEC09
MCCAIN.PALIN.WAR.RUSSIA.DEC09
MCCAIN.PALIN.WAR.IRAN.DEC10
MCCAIN.PALIN.WAR.RUSSIA.DEC10
MCCAIN.PALIN.WAR.IRAN.DEC11
MCCAIN.PALIN.WAR.RUSSIA.DEC11
MCCAIN.PALIN.WAR.IRAN.DEC12
MCCAIN.PALIN.WAR.RUSSIA.DEC12

Between the two of them we better start digging our fallout shelters pretty soon. Even Cheney and Wolfowitz are cringing right now.
More...
 
Quote from brocklanders:


Between the two of them we better start digging our fallout shelters pretty soon. Even Cheney and Wolfowitz are cringing right now.
More...

Dude, your government has been encouraging man woman and child to build fallout shelters since the early fifties.

Sure, a modern fallout shelter would cost more, but, unless you would prefer your kids "sheltering" under a school table, , like a 60's educational video,you have kinda been given the green light there.
No tax advantages, oddly enough, and likely nothing in terms of local gov.

Oh, wait-could the sub prime crisis be because all these homes DIDN'T have a nuclear bunker?

Fuck me, what is wrong with you people.
 
Quote from acronym:

No tax advantages, oddly enough, and likely nothing in terms of local gov.
More...

Maybe McSame will throw us a bone and make them tax-deductible. Seems like the fair thing to do since they are intent on saber-rattling war talk with the country sitting on the largest nuclear arsenal (new-clear for you GOPers).

Palin: We will not repeat a Cold War.

There was a good reason the Cold War stayed COLD. I would rather have second Cold War than a first nuclear one.

GIBSON: And under the NATO treaty, wouldn't we then have to go to war if Russia went into Georgia?

PALIN: Perhaps so.

You don't offer answers like that to hypothetical situations. Words matter in foreign policy and she just flunked her first test. Put her muzzle back on, she's not ready for prime time yet.
 
Quote from Pa(b)st Prime:


"She did a good job." ... "She did well and man is she a pretty woman."
More...

LOL! Put it back in your pants and rewatch the video. That interview was embarrassing. She sounded worse than Bush.
 
Quote from brocklanders:

Maybe McSame will throw us a bone and make them tax-deductible. Seems like the fair thing to do since they are intent on saber-rattling war talk with the country sitting on the largest nuclear arsenal (new-clear for you GOPers).

Palin: We will not repeat a Cold War.
she's not ready for prime time yet.
More...

Well, all well and good.
Bizarrely, not any of these states attempted direct negotiations with russia.

Wait, they are not allowed to.
Federal issues.

Putin is not an unreasonable man, he is ex-kgb after all. Hah.
Surely, its possible, to carve up the free world, and avoid ww3.
 
Charley boy Gibson kept asking for "yes" answers and Sarah kept on track with her viewpoints.

I see more of a man in Sarah than I do with the effeminate Obama. Sarah would slap Putin silly while Obama would turn around and bend over.
 
"In a very dangerous world"...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_of_fear

I strongly object to this aggressive outlook on the universe. It is fundamentally wrong and polarizing everything around you as being "against you". That means one is a simplistic darwinist or just plain ignorant.

It would mean that you need to stay in conflict with everything in life... and that is plain hogwash and outright impossible.
The "non-aggression principle" is the fundamental right understanding of the universe and ethics - guidance for our actions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asymmetric_warfare
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasoning
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-aggression_principle

Many religions do not adhere to this understanding of non-aggression, because they include numerous ignorant contradictions - and that is why religion is not based on reasoning, but rather blind ignorant faith.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_of_faith
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top