International Criminal Court filed against Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Tenet, Rice and

J

joe123

Leading Professor Francis A. Boyle of the University of Illinois College of Law in Champaign, USA, has filed a complaint with the prosecutor for the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague against US citizens George W. Bush, Richard Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, George Tenet, Condoleezza Rice and Alberto Gonzales (the “Accused”) for their criminal policy and practice of “extraordinary rendition” perpetrated upon about 100 human beings.

“Extraordinary rendition” is a euphemism for the enforced disappearance of persons and their consequent torture. This criminal policy and practice by the Accused constitutes crimes against humanity in violation of the Rome Statute establishing the ICC.

http://www.redress.cc/global/redress20100206
 
Quote from joe123:

“extraordinary rendition” perpetrated upon about 100 human beings.
More...
What about the genocide in africa...
Sounds like the icc needs to get 1st things first speech from world famous motivational speaker "'Mr Tony Robbins"
Yeah you can do it
empower yourself .....
 
Quote from joe123:

Leading Professor Francis A. Boyle of the University of Illinois College of Law in Champaign, USA, has filed a complaint with the prosecutor for the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague against US citizens George W. Bush, Richard Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, George Tenet, Condoleezza Rice and Alberto Gonzales (the “Accused”) for their criminal policy and practice of “extraordinary rendition” perpetrated upon about 100 human beings.

“Extraordinary rendition” is a euphemism for the enforced disappearance of persons and their consequent torture. This criminal policy and practice by the Accused constitutes crimes against humanity in violation of the Rome Statute establishing the ICC.

http://www.redress.cc/global/redress20100206
More...
It's only torture if defined by law. Waterboarding was legal. Therefore, the case has no merit, even though they ordered waterboarding.

As for the sexual torture, well, it obviously wasn't them.

Disappearance? Anyone could look up the names of the captives held at anytime. Thus, no disappearance as they could be found.
 
Quote from Buzzed:

It's only torture if defined by law. Waterboarding was legal. Therefore, the case has no merit.

As for the sexual torture, well, it obviously wasn't them.
More...

I don't suppose you see anything wrong with "the accused"

don't bother answering, the question was designed to expose you as morally bankrupt person. :cool:
 
Quote from Buzzed:

It's only torture if defined by law. Waterboarding was legal. Therefore, the case has no merit, even though they ordered waterboarding.
More...

Try to waterboard your children. Then use your argument to defend yourself in the court.
 
Anyone who thinks they were just waterboarding is a complete moron.

But then wrap whatever they were doing in the ludicrous word of 'freedom' and everything is suddendly justified.
 
Quote from Tresor:

Try to waterboard your children. Then use your argument to defend yourself in the court.
More...
An excellent counter-defence. Perhaps this case has some merit afterall.
 
Quote from Tresor:

Try to waterboard your children. Then use your argument to defend yourself in the court.
More...

A US soldier apparently did just that!

A soldier waterboarded his four-year-old daughter because she was unable to recite her alphabet.

Joshua Tabor admitted to police he had used the CIA torture technique because he was so angry.

As his daughter 'squirmed' to get away, Tabor said he submerged her face three or four times until the water was lapping around her forehead and jawline.

Tabor, 27, who had won custody of his daughter only four weeks earlier, admitted choosing the punishment because the girl was terrified of water.
More...

http://tinyurl.com/ykfq3w8
 
Quote from Buzzed:

It's only torture if defined by law. Waterboarding was legal. Therefore, the case has no merit, even though they ordered waterboarding.

As for the sexual torture, well, it obviously wasn't them.

Disappearance? Anyone could look up the names of the captives held at anytime. Thus, no disappearance as they could be found.
More...

International Law.

I dunno about US law, but I suspect that it may well be illegal in US law as well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top