Quote from def:
You're wrong about this. IB is not in the business of being a quote provider.
I give you ten bucks. You give me quotes. Is that not a business transaction?
Sure, it may not be your main business. In fact, you might be losing money on it. The fact is, if someone is looking for a quote provider, your prices can't be beat.
Data fees are passed to a given exchange for disseminating their quotes. IB charges 10 bucks a month for all US stocks, futures and options for those doing under $30 a month in commission. For those doing more than that, IB eats the cost - it is free. There are fees to the NYSE, OPRA, NASDAQ, CBOE, CBOT, etc. Which one of these provides the COMP? Someone has to calculate and disseminate it and pay licensing fees if appropriate. Would you prefer that IB doesn't provide the rebate and provide the COMP, trin and tick?
I do hundreds of dollars in commisions each month at IB. How about offering the comp to people that do a minimum of $100 a month. $200/month? The point is, you don't offer the comp for _any_ price. There was a time when IB had no Level II quotes. Now you have them for $79/month. How much would it cost per month if IB were to offer comp quotes?
FWIW, There are issues that make disseminating an index not so cut and dry. There is no way that IB is going to be able to be all things to all people. If it was a simple matter, it would have been added. In any event, I for one believe that if you are going to actively trade you should have a secondary quote source.
I currently use 3 real-time quote sources for my trading. If IB ever gives me comp quotes, I just might decide to use only 2.
---- And for people who are solely using IB for quotes ----> you convinced me that we definately shouldn't offer such services. All they do is drain resources from those that actively trade.
Is that a threat?
