Quote from ddaytrader:
Yes, it is very ugly on Interactive Brokers part, and it has made it very difficult for me to place orders if I am not going to be able to watch the screen like a hawk.
The facts are on my side, and I have the screen captures to back my case up.
I would hope that Interactive Brokers fixes this cheat without the need for extraordinary actions, either legal or by appealing to a regulatory body or arbitration.
I have to say that I was shocked when this was not corrected within a day or two. Like I said, my experience in the past with one or two screwy forex trades with Interactive Brokers had always been corrected quickly. This is the first time an issue like this has been allowed to fester for over a month.
Quote from ddaytrader:
What you three think really doesn't matter. Though it was not my intention, my posts here got IB's attention, and as a result help is apparently on the way. I should thank you three, because it was your posts in response to my issue that prompted me to post more here than I had intended, and that perhaps helped get this matter in front of fresh eyes at IB.
Quote from ddaytrader:
I was filled at a price more than 50 pips lower than my stop order. This was a stop market order. IB's customer service acknowledges that the order should have been filled about 55 pips higher
I am still trading with Interactive Brokers
Quote from Options12:
newwurld, I think in a portfolio margin account you have more time to cover a shortfall than in a reg T account--
this is from Interactive Bbrokers' statement on portfolio margin below. Check out numbers 7 & 8.....
Autaliquidation is somthing that "every single IB account" has atached to it. (even cash accounts can be autoliquidated if some IB fees detucted from account is putting your cash at -$10).