e. interlocking fractal ratio.
This invention was done with a deductive proof. Think of geometry or even quantum mechanics in theoretical physics.
I prefer the volume proof but that involves too many other inventions; so lets stick to the lagging indicator of markets called price.
You look at market patterns.
By thinking, you discover how geometry was built.
You use a simple theorem and its deductive proof. I will assume you can prove that two points determine a line.
Step up to triple A league for a moment. Use Keynes's theory of algorithms. HS's must be two things: in kind, and complete as a set.
Making money in markets is done with only one variable; it is the lagging indicator, price.
We use significant points on price to do a geometric proof.
Potential traders have a very low bar to pass to enter trading. They have to have parents that will set up accounts for them to trade using the parents money and a PC.
This makes geometry proofs something to be learned in the future for some of these traders.
Amazingly, only two adjacent bars are required. Some work for the proof others do not. You must go through this discovery by looking at a graphic already prepared by fifth graders in a one hour class during the first 15 minutes. Assume you did this.
From this you discover that the Keynesian Paremetric Measure is a vector and not a scalor.
Wow.
We know know that connecting extremes of two bars give us the significant side of the market price container. I have seen published books on trading have authors and readers NOT know this. Publishers know less.
On that sheet the fifth graders did, they invented turning adjacent bars that did not "qualify" into single bars that set the scene for adding the next bar to see if the two bars did qualify.
They named the process "quishng". You can learn when and how to squish.
To continue to prove (like be a smart algorithm), you do draw the line on the left side of the wo bars using Their extreme and ge vector result. This "defines" the sentiment of a lagging indicator, price.
In geometry there is another theorem that you pick out and prove. The one for parallel lines. Boink! there it is. yu are not very far into the book you used which explained 20% of the proofs of geometry in the cheap skate school you when to.
Okay clone or duplicate the line you drew and create the highest volatility container you can by chosing an extremest point on one of the two adjacent bars.
My goodness what have you done. You ar- tick- u - lated the "simplest" and most foundational container of a granulated container. Now, simplify it more by taking granulation to account.
You now have two one tick bars that are offset by a vector amount in algorthmic vector measure.
In trends, volume advances your thinking. Trends have an even number of ends.
Lets climb out of trend theory a little farther. if yo do the minimalist approach on this parallelogram by watching the futre move into the Present, you see more ticking going on.
You know the sentiment and that could be one of two characters: dominant or non-dominant. The vector of the Right Trend Line (RTL) dictates the dominance.
A person like a fifth grader can learn that trading is a left/right winning strategy. As a person gets olde he is inflexble and becomes stupider and stupider. He sesides in the up down world where he can no longer prove all trends have three moves.
I assume here that I can tell you this fact above stated and you like all fifth graders can do the "ticking of adjacent bars just like they learned Arithmetic the Montisorri way. But I notice ET members are mostlky shitheads who do not know Arithmetic as yet. You are NOT because you want to learn to learn to be able to be an expert trader.
All trends have three moves constructucted from the fastest fractal to the slowest fractal by interlocking the relative moves fractal to fractal.
Use line drawings to prove this to yourself. Or google all this stuff that has been posted before and after the invention of the PC.
This invention was done with a deductive proof. Think of geometry or even quantum mechanics in theoretical physics.
I prefer the volume proof but that involves too many other inventions; so lets stick to the lagging indicator of markets called price.
You look at market patterns.
By thinking, you discover how geometry was built.
You use a simple theorem and its deductive proof. I will assume you can prove that two points determine a line.
Step up to triple A league for a moment. Use Keynes's theory of algorithms. HS's must be two things: in kind, and complete as a set.
Making money in markets is done with only one variable; it is the lagging indicator, price.
We use significant points on price to do a geometric proof.
Potential traders have a very low bar to pass to enter trading. They have to have parents that will set up accounts for them to trade using the parents money and a PC.
This makes geometry proofs something to be learned in the future for some of these traders.
Amazingly, only two adjacent bars are required. Some work for the proof others do not. You must go through this discovery by looking at a graphic already prepared by fifth graders in a one hour class during the first 15 minutes. Assume you did this.
From this you discover that the Keynesian Paremetric Measure is a vector and not a scalor.
Wow.
We know know that connecting extremes of two bars give us the significant side of the market price container. I have seen published books on trading have authors and readers NOT know this. Publishers know less.
On that sheet the fifth graders did, they invented turning adjacent bars that did not "qualify" into single bars that set the scene for adding the next bar to see if the two bars did qualify.
They named the process "quishng". You can learn when and how to squish.
To continue to prove (like be a smart algorithm), you do draw the line on the left side of the wo bars using Their extreme and ge vector result. This "defines" the sentiment of a lagging indicator, price.
In geometry there is another theorem that you pick out and prove. The one for parallel lines. Boink! there it is. yu are not very far into the book you used which explained 20% of the proofs of geometry in the cheap skate school you when to.
Okay clone or duplicate the line you drew and create the highest volatility container you can by chosing an extremest point on one of the two adjacent bars.
My goodness what have you done. You ar- tick- u - lated the "simplest" and most foundational container of a granulated container. Now, simplify it more by taking granulation to account.
You now have two one tick bars that are offset by a vector amount in algorthmic vector measure.
In trends, volume advances your thinking. Trends have an even number of ends.
Lets climb out of trend theory a little farther. if yo do the minimalist approach on this parallelogram by watching the futre move into the Present, you see more ticking going on.
You know the sentiment and that could be one of two characters: dominant or non-dominant. The vector of the Right Trend Line (RTL) dictates the dominance.
A person like a fifth grader can learn that trading is a left/right winning strategy. As a person gets olde he is inflexble and becomes stupider and stupider. He sesides in the up down world where he can no longer prove all trends have three moves.
I assume here that I can tell you this fact above stated and you like all fifth graders can do the "ticking of adjacent bars just like they learned Arithmetic the Montisorri way. But I notice ET members are mostlky shitheads who do not know Arithmetic as yet. You are NOT because you want to learn to learn to be able to be an expert trader.
All trends have three moves constructucted from the fastest fractal to the slowest fractal by interlocking the relative moves fractal to fractal.
Use line drawings to prove this to yourself. Or google all this stuff that has been posted before and after the invention of the PC.
