You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Intelligent Design struck down in Federal Court
- Thread starter ZZZzzzzzzz
- Start date
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:
The biological evolutionists seem overwhelmingly convinced that our existence is by random ignorant lifeless chance, not by any possible intelligent design.
Not quite. Some belive that matter and energy in our universe has properties which can eventually lead to molecular self organization and replication. Some belive that it is not random at all, but a certainty given the nature of our universe.
If a creator is responsible for that, then you have given yourself the task to convince these scientists of this belief.
Why are you arguing with us anyway?
Quote from dgabriel:
I think he had an acid flashback on that last post.
Evolution (a fact) is not an explanation for creation. Apples and oranges.
Scientists have attained neither consensus within their community nor offered compelling proof of creation. Therefore Z hits in right on the head.
Quote from dgabriel:
Not quite. Some belive that matter and energy in our universe has properties which can eventually lead to molecular self organization and replication. Some belive that it is not random at all, but a certainty given the nature of our universe.
If a creator is responsible for that, then you have given yourself the task to convince these scientists of this belief.
Why are you arguing with us anyway?
We already had this exact argument with Z, went to over 300 replies iirc. In the end Z still didn't want science taught as fact, even if one were to define fact as that which derives from universal observability, logic, and repeatability.
Uhhhh, thanks for misrepresenting me.
Teach fact and facts of science, not fanciful theory of scientists.
When you can repeat "evolution forces" systematically, predictably, and with the regularity of the four major forces of physics, showing the math behind each of these processes...let me know.
Until then, lets teach what we know as fact in the public school systems, not what the current thought of scientists or their belief may be.....until a child's mind has the strength of its own convictions, the ability to reason for themselves and challenge their teachers thinking....not just sitting there and swalling the spew and the mush from the head of a science teacher on a mission against the idea of God and an intelligently created Universe.
Teach fact and facts of science, not fanciful theory of scientists.
When you can repeat "evolution forces" systematically, predictably, and with the regularity of the four major forces of physics, showing the math behind each of these processes...let me know.
Until then, lets teach what we know as fact in the public school systems, not what the current thought of scientists or their belief may be.....until a child's mind has the strength of its own convictions, the ability to reason for themselves and challenge their teachers thinking....not just sitting there and swalling the spew and the mush from the head of a science teacher on a mission against the idea of God and an intelligently created Universe.
Quote from Ricter:
We already had this exact argument with Z, went to over 300 replies iirc. In the end Z still didn't want science taught as fact, even if one were to define fact as that which derives from universal observability, logic, and repeatability.
I see it didn't take long for the ad hominem attacks.
You guys lose, again....
You guys lose, again....