Intelligent Design is not creationism
- Thread starter Teleologist
- Start date
All you have ever done is reprint what you've already posted.
To someone like yourself who cannot ever be wrong, every argument against what you've posted which doesn't fit with your own personal religious beliefs you call bullshit.
Every reference, every comment, every video - you have been unable to rationalize.
All you can ever do is misrepresent them and repeat them again and again, and make more false claims just like you have above, with no care towards the integrity of any argument.
I'm talking to a fool, that much is surely right.
Real argument has been made against that, by others also.
The only response you have is not to answer, but rather just repeat the same thing over and over again like an old broken xerox machine.
But itâs not quite the same. Recently you changed the word 'options' to 'possibilities'. Different altogether. Are you even aware of that?
Are you also even aware you are repeatedly posting a broken link .
Obviously there's very little if anything correct in stuff you post.
The only response you have is not to answer, but rather just repeat the same thing over and over again like an old broken xerox machine.
But itâs not quite the same. Recently you changed the word 'options' to 'possibilities'. Different altogether. Are you even aware of that?
Are you also even aware you are repeatedly posting a broken link .
Obviously there's very little if anything correct in stuff you post.
Suskind states here are 4 options - possibilities to explain the knife's edge fine tuning...
1. God (that is correct... susskind says it)
2. luck
3. megaverse/ multiverse
4. someday find a theory of everything.
http://www.closertotruth.com/
then type in susskind and look for the video regarding tuning.
1. God (that is correct... susskind says it)
2. luck
3. megaverse/ multiverse
4. someday find a theory of everything.
http://www.closertotruth.com/
then type in susskind and look for the video regarding tuning.
what was your point troll.
you did not explain anything.
you attempted to change the subject but all you did was troll out some garbage about options vs possibilities - but you provided no substance.
If I were attempting to distinguish Stu from Stupid... I would explain the difference and provide citations.
For 7 years you argued against tunings and the possible explanation of tuner.
But, you years of lies are over...
Suskind states here are 4 possibilities to explain the knife's edge fine tuning...
1. God (that is correct... susskind says it)
2. luck
3. megaverse/ multiverse
4. someday find a theory of everything.
http://www.closertotruth.com/video-...d-Susskind-/431
---
Susskind is right. God is an option, as is Zeus an option, just as Fairy Dust is an option.
However, were any of those options capable of turning into possibilities, then all of them are possibilities, as much as any other supernatural concepts are.
"Luck, megaverse/ multiverse, someday find a theory of everything" are not supernatural concepts. They have the potential to be scientifically confirmed. Unlike supernatural things, which although sometimes can be made to sound intruiging, though not by you, amount to no more than convoluted mind burps.
Nevertheless, infantile insult is obviously the option you prefer to revert to, giving little to no possibility you're going to be anything but very angry and irrational because there is no place for your so called tuner/designer in science. Except perhaps in areas of study which can determine why some humans' are overly susceptible to the superstition of religion.
However, were any of those options capable of turning into possibilities, then all of them are possibilities, as much as any other supernatural concepts are.
"Luck, megaverse/ multiverse, someday find a theory of everything" are not supernatural concepts. They have the potential to be scientifically confirmed. Unlike supernatural things, which although sometimes can be made to sound intruiging, though not by you, amount to no more than convoluted mind burps.
Nevertheless, infantile insult is obviously the option you prefer to revert to, giving little to no possibility you're going to be anything but very angry and irrational because there is no place for your so called tuner/designer in science. Except perhaps in areas of study which can determine why some humans' are overly susceptible to the superstition of religion.
So this is your not so subtle hint that you are a troll, shocking just shocking revelation .
