Intelligent Design is not creationism

Z... I read your fumbling attempt to use the word 'karma' in a sentence, a few posts above this one. You were holding forth on the topic of Buddhism. You have appeared to be an idiot many times on these boards, but perhaps never as thoroughly as you did when you started pretending you knew what you were talking about re: Buddhism.

One good thing is this: after I hammered you into the ground regarding the contradictions between the charges you level at others and the infantile behaviour you yourself exhibit, you have stopped posting child-like images of bunny rabbits and other weird shit from your personal image library, something you used to do whenever your arguments started to become too circular or your assertions were laid out for everyone to see, as they have been by stu here.

Remember, when Z starts using LOL a lot and using the word 'pathetic', it means "I am getting uncomfortable and I want to change the subject'.

You can thank me for this anytime, zEvader.

________________________________________

Member of the ET Anti-Troll Brigade

iustus ignarus troll
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Oh, very nice adult response stu, very nice...you appear to be cracking up again when ideas go over your head.

Is a round pencil a circle? Or is it a thick line? Or is it both? Or is it just a pencil?

Too funny, you two...no take that back...one dimensional thinkers...

This is what happens when someone cannot think in an abstract manner beyond the boundaries a simple mind, they get stuck in deep confusion when someone presents concepts that include seemingly conflicting points of view, as they are not able to understand that the arrived at points of view are relative to the viewer, the viewed, and the process of observation. They think from a partial point of view, and struggle mightily when confronted with ideas that simultaneously take into account multiple points of view. They are like infants who throw tantrums when something is beyond their capacity to understand.

Watching them is a bit like watching a computer that locks up when too much multitasking is required.

Then, if they are adult children, all they can do it begin tirades and insults, and act put off, insulted and above it all.

Such a joke...

If I were a troll, and I deny that I am, I would have to be the most successful troll in history to continually sucker you into looking like a fool...
More...

amazing... pure ad hominem!!
 
Okay, I've lost track of why Buddhism has been brought into the debate over ID. For the sake of argument let's say that Buddhism is incompatible with ID. So what?
 
Guys,

If there was an all powerfull being, we'd know it by now.

The Dichotomy:

All powerful, all good.
OK, explain sub Sahara Africa and wars in general.

The omnipotent/beneficial thing is done to death.

If you believe in God, then maybe he will help your trading accts?
 
Your POV is that of a westerner thinking of God and man.

The eastern point of view has the POV of nothing but a 100% fair system of cause and effect...

Quote from Jayford:

Guys,

If there was an all powerfull being, we'd know it by now.

The Dichotomy:

All powerful, all good.
OK, explain sub Sahara Africa and wars in general.

The omnipotent/beneficial thing is done to death.

If you believe in God, then maybe he will help your trading accts?
More...
 
Quote from Teleologist:

Okay, I've lost track of why Buddhism has been brought into the debate over ID. For the sake of argument let's say that Buddhism is incompatible with ID. So what?
More...

Argue that with z10.
 
Why should he?

Oh yeah, I forced you to post your cut and paste job regarding Buddhism, I force stu to go off on his tangents, and I forced the clones to practice their "ignoring of trolls."

In any case, ID, as I refer to ID is non denominational, as it is not representative of any particular religion or religious belief system, and no one has shown that statement to be false. I didn't introduce Buddhism into the debate, that canard was the birth of one of the resident atheist/ignorant chance supporters.

The ID I refer to doesn't even require God or gods, it simply requires intelligence behind what we see, by design, not random ignorant chance.


Quote from james_bond_3rd:

Argue that with z10.
More...
 
Quote from Jayford:

Guys,

If there was an all powerfull being, we'd know it by now.

The Dichotomy:

All powerful, all good.
OK, explain sub Sahara Africa and wars in general.

The omnipotent/beneficial thing is done to death.

If you believe in God, then maybe he will help your trading accts?
More...

Stick around. I am explaining this. Briefly, this world is not for the knowing of God. It is an attempt to unknow Him in every way, shape and form going all the way back to before a "big bang".

Everything here is meant to deceive you. When you consider that the deception is self-deception and that the self is omnipotent, you can understand why you are slow to figure it out.

When an omnipotent will splits itself into separate allegiances, separate goals, the result is tyranny and imprisonment.

Not to worry. As it is only you who can imprison yourself, the power of decision is still with you to free yourself. That is all you have left of your omnipotence, and all you need to have it restored.

Jesus
 
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Who can say who is a true Buddhist?

LOL!!!

Do you think that the current Dali Llama knows who the true Buddhists are, and who are the fake Buddhists?

Really funny stuff...

This is every bit as ridiculous as the Christians calling other Christians non Christians...
More...

Yes it's rediculous because all are "the Buddha" and all are "Christ". And "Christ" and "the Buddha" are different symbols for the same reality.

It is quite possible to see "the Buddha" or "the face of Christ" in everyone, because that is who they are at the level of reality.

If you can see anything other than this, it is you who are the "fake". To see bodies is to see "fakes", and it is only possible to see what you think you are.

You can only think you are not the Christ or the Buddha. But you cannot change your reality with such thoughts. All attempts to distinguish Christ from Christ or Buddha from Buddha are attempts to separate Oneness and make fakes instead.

Any attempt to do so shows the fake-i-ness of the faking fakers...so to speak.

Jesus:)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top