So you don't believe that there is ID.
Intelligent Design is not creationism
- Thread starter Teleologist
- Start date
So you don't believe that there is ID.
Las Vegas is the product of intelligent designers...
Very intelligent...
Those who blame Vegas for their losses are children...
Very intelligent...
Those who blame Vegas for their losses are children...
Quote from james_bond_3rd:
So you don't believe that there is ID.
Don't change the subject. Do you or do you not believe that there is an ID of the market?
Let's not use the word "blame" because you misunderstood my question. In your research how do you treat your losses? Aside from possible deficiencies in your system/trading strategy, in the best case scenario, what do you think are the causes of your losses? Are they not "random ignorant chances?"
The market place is a product of intelligent design, or course.
In my trading I treat my losses as losses. It is just a cost of doing business.
I think the cause of the losses is the effect of being on the wrong side of the market. That happens to speculators all the time...
In my trading I treat my losses as losses. It is just a cost of doing business.
I think the cause of the losses is the effect of being on the wrong side of the market. That happens to speculators all the time...
First of all, you're changing the subject again. "The market place" is certainly a product of ID. But what about the market itself?
Did you ever want to find out why you were on the "wrong" side of the market? If you don't want to know, how did you ever make money?
The "market" is a product of the market place...
Doh!
Being on the wrong side of the market is just the cost of doing business, it happens from time to time.
Doh!
Being on the wrong side of the market is just the cost of doing business, it happens from time to time.
Clueless, as usual.
Without knowing what you're doing, aren't you just gambling?
I know what I am doing, thanks.
They call it "speculating."
They call it "speculating."
Here's a thought.
The anti-religious, if they weren't so blinded by their hate of religion, would embrace Intelligent Design.
We can all agree that religion is and was at the heart of many conflicts today and throughout history. ID could be viewed as an attempt to remove all religious dogma from the most profound of questions, and expose a common thread among all religious beliefs. (The belief there is a god, .... and he is the reason for everything)
Unfortunately, the left is too busy hating the christian right, and ridiculing gay evangelicals to see a good thing when it happens.
The "tolerant" and "diverse" left ... are the most intolerant and divisive only when it comes to the traditions that they are products of .... blah ...
The anti-religious, if they weren't so blinded by their hate of religion, would embrace Intelligent Design.
We can all agree that religion is and was at the heart of many conflicts today and throughout history. ID could be viewed as an attempt to remove all religious dogma from the most profound of questions, and expose a common thread among all religious beliefs. (The belief there is a god, .... and he is the reason for everything)
Unfortunately, the left is too busy hating the christian right, and ridiculing gay evangelicals to see a good thing when it happens.
The "tolerant" and "diverse" left ... are the most intolerant and divisive only when it comes to the traditions that they are products of .... blah ...
why would someone wantto embrace an idea that makes no sense to them?
then surely, that would be fair reason to have hate of religion.
you suggest exposeing a common religious thread for folks that makes no sense to them , stick it through religion, when you have given fair reason to hate religion . eh?
a more profound thought perhaps