Quote from james_bond_3rd:
This forum is for entertainment. At best, the contribution is to the education of the less knowledgeable and even that I doubt because people like you refuse to be educated. You're delusional if you believe that the discussion here contributes to any real knowledge.
So what has changed since the 70's when some scientists proposed the iceage theory? We simply have vastly more evidence that point the other way. If you want to stick to old "science" theories, 300 years ago scientists thought that wood contains the "fire element" which gives burning, what has changed since then? 2000 years ago scientists thought that the earth was the center of the universe, what has changed since then?
So you're a lawyer. We all know how much a laywer knows. (Which is entirely uncorrelated to how much he makes.)
I challenge you to provide comprehensive statst that prove anything.
My information shows that most of the warming" is most likely from the increased population density in cities.
for every graph that shows a warming trend there is another that shows a decrease or no change. "it is not global" -
You can point to some ice that is melting and you can also find glaciers that are increasing.
I am not saying we are not in a warming trend. I am just not aware of any stats that prove it or any information that says we should not be warming as part of he long term cycle.
By the way if we cant predict weather 2 weeks in advance how can we expect computer models to be accurate out a thousand years.