Intelligent Design is not creationism

Quote from 2cents:

and since when are hybrids systematically infertile??

Give me an example of a hybrid "species" that is fertile with itself and not fertile with either parent species.
 
Quote from Jampilier:

Give me an example of a hybrid "species" that is fertile with itself and not fertile with either parent species.
and then you'll stop making erroneous assertions?
 
Quote from 2cents:

and then you'll stop making erroneous assertions?

Don't fall for the ploy. He will consistently move the goal posts to avoid admitting observed speciation if you don't force him to define all of the conditions in advance.

And, if he does define all the conditions, they will likely be set up so as to be impossible to satisify under any reasonable circumstance.
 
Quote from ratboy88:

let's have the missing links.... this should be interesting.

There's no point in producing evidence only to have it dismissed as not meeting a set of conditions which are constantly redefined so as to avoid admitting that observed speciation is scientifically established.
 
Quote from 2cents:

and then you'll stop making erroneous assertions?

I'll do my best.

Repeating:

Give me an example of a hybrid "species" that is fertile with itself and not fertile with either parent species.
 
Quote from Jampilier:

I'll do my best.

Repeating:

Give me an example of a hybrid "species" that is fertile with itself and not fertile with either parent species.

Any/every existing species whose ancestors are now extinct satisfies your silly request.
 
Back
Top