You can evaluate for yourself who wants to get back to the topic of ID and creationism, and who wants to continue down a fallacious, false and useless path...
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Intelligent Design is not creationism
- Thread starter Teleologist
- Start date
Yeah, right. You're the Queen of repetitive posting. How many times have you responded to my posts with the exact same post? You're the Queen of red herring bizarre image posts here. What a fucking hypocrite you truly are.
And by the way, totally pathetic attempt to misspell the name of your new alias in an effort to show that it's not yours. Either that or you've fallen off the wagon, again.
Once again, nice job kj, for revealing the Z is posting under the username Teleologist.
And by the way, totally pathetic attempt to misspell the name of your new alias in an effort to show that it's not yours. Either that or you've fallen off the wagon, again.
Once again, nice job kj, for revealing the Z is posting under the username Teleologist.
thing is, ID / creationism IS such a path, as has been aptly exposed by a number of posters, drtomaso, kj etc... i can't really blame Nik for displaying his trademark pitbull talents here... just remind him that its a useless tactic... always better to talk to the topic...Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:
You can evaluate for yourself who wants to get back to the topic of ID and creationism, and who wants to continue down a fallacious, false and useless path...
More troll gobbledygook...
Quote from traderNik:
Yeah, right. You're the Queen of repetitive posting. How many times have you responded to my posts with the exact same post? You're the Queen of red herring bizarre image posts here. What a fucking hypocrite you truly are.
And by the way, totally pathetic attempt to misspell the name of your new alias in an effort to show that it's not yours. Either that or you've fallen off the wagon, again.
Once again, nice job kj, for revealing the Z is posting under the username Teleologist.
More troll gobbledygook...
Quote from traderNik:
Yeah, right. You're the Queen of repetitive posting. How many times have you responded to my posts with the exact same post? You're the Queen of red herring bizarre image posts here. What a fucking hypocrite you truly are.
And by the way, totally pathetic attempt to misspell the name of your new alias in an effort to show that it's not yours. Either that or you've fallen off the wagon, again.
Once again, nice job kj, for revealing the Z is posting under the username Teleologist.
That is your opinion that it has been exposed, but I disagree.
The central component of non ID theory is based on ignorance, i.e. ignorance of the cause of change.
There is no mathematical formula for so called "random" mutations, no way to predict with precision when and where they might happen, no explanation of why they happen...we are just left to accept that it is some mysterious unguided random force that triggers these "random" mutations.
It is this twisting of the facts, which are not in debate, which are the at the cornerstone of Darwinism and neo Darwinism, and when someone brings to fore the obvious weakness of a theory founded in ignorance, they are glossed over and the distraction away from these central points begins...
If you can't find blame with the bulldog tactics of trollnik, then I guess you are supportive of those tactics...which begs the question why you even bothered to comment on them...
The central component of non ID theory is based on ignorance, i.e. ignorance of the cause of change.
There is no mathematical formula for so called "random" mutations, no way to predict with precision when and where they might happen, no explanation of why they happen...we are just left to accept that it is some mysterious unguided random force that triggers these "random" mutations.
It is this twisting of the facts, which are not in debate, which are the at the cornerstone of Darwinism and neo Darwinism, and when someone brings to fore the obvious weakness of a theory founded in ignorance, they are glossed over and the distraction away from these central points begins...
If you can't find blame with the bulldog tactics of trollnik, then I guess you are supportive of those tactics...which begs the question why you even bothered to comment on them...
Quote from 2cents:
thing is, ID / creationism IS such a path, as has been aptly exposed by a number of posters, drtomaso, kj etc... i can't really blame Nik for displaying his trademark pitbull talents here... just remind him that its a useless tactic... always better to talk to the topic...
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:
That is your opinion that it has been exposed, but I disagree.
The central component of non ID theory is based on ignorance, i.e. ignorance of the cause of change.
There is no mathematical formula for so called "random" mutations, no way to predict with precision when and where they might happen, no explanation of why they happen...we are just left to accept that it is some mysterious unguided random force that triggers these "random" mutations.
It is this twisting of the facts, which are not in debate, which are the at the cornerstone of Darwinism and neo Darwinism, and when someone brings to fore the obvious weakness of a theory founded in ignorance, they are glossed over and the distraction away from these central points begins...
Q: Z, what is the origin of life on Earth?
A: Magistrates were materialized out of pure potentiality.
Yep, a really scientific, provable stance
Z, you never did explain to us why you made this statement in your last ID thread and then recanted it a few days later. Care to try to splash your way to an explanation? Was it because you realized that you were admitting your beliefs regarding the origin of life on Earth were 100% faith-based and therefore not easy to shoehorn into an ID framework?
I belive this is exactly what happened.
More troll gobbledygook...
Quote from traderNik:
Q: Z, what is the origin of life on Earth?
A: Magistrates were materialized out of pure potentiality.
Yep, a really scientific, provable stance
Z, you never did explain to us why you made this statement in your last ID thread and then recanted it a few days later. Care to try to splash your way to an explanation? Was it because you realized that you were admitting your beliefs regarding the origin of life on Earth were 100% faith-based and therefore not easy to shoehorn into an ID framework?
I belive this is exactly what happened.