Miller presents an excellent case for a thinking audience during the course of about an hour. How can I hope to present what he had to say anywhere near as well as he did? Further, how much typing would it involve to cover enough material to do his argument justice? If you're not willing to listen to it, I sure as hell am not going to bother typing it for you. You pretend that you want dialogue, but you do not. You are just playing games. You don't really care what anyone has to say. Like Bush, you seem have that special ability to make informed decisions in a vacuum. And that is your prerogative. As it is mine to no longer waste any more time on this merry-go-round.
It is interesting that you engage extensively in cut-and-paste posting. Not that I mind, because some of them are worth reading. I guess it just doesn't work both ways, does it?