The mayor just fired the city manager for- earlier today- saying the officer was entitled to due process.
Looks like the city manager is going to be getting a big pay day from the city at some point along with the shooting victim's family which will be bigger of course.
Sheesh. The mayor gutted the city manager right there in order to score political points. Problem iis, the city managers response was 100% correct, 100% professional, and 100% legally and union agreement mandated. If the mayor has a bitch with the shooting, a bitch with whitey and white power then some of this is understandable but gutting his black brother city manager is not the way to do it. It also gonna come with a price tag for the city, possibly even reinstatement.
If he was fired for not handling it properly within their due process supporting procedures then that would be new and different but that is not how it is being reported. It is being reported on a couple networks that it was for his statement that the officer would be entitled to due process. A city manager never goes wrong by saying any employee is entitled to due process, while the lawyers guide what that must look like. The fucking officer shoots an unarmed guy point blank due to fuck up and you are trying to quell a potential riot by lynching the black city manager as an offering to the crowd. AHHH, NO. THAT DOG DON'T HUNT.
I reserve the right to change my view if the facts reported change.
Looks like the city manager is going to be getting a big pay day from the city at some point along with the shooting victim's family which will be bigger of course.
Sheesh. The mayor gutted the city manager right there in order to score political points. Problem iis, the city managers response was 100% correct, 100% professional, and 100% legally and union agreement mandated. If the mayor has a bitch with the shooting, a bitch with whitey and white power then some of this is understandable but gutting his black brother city manager is not the way to do it. It also gonna come with a price tag for the city, possibly even reinstatement.
If he was fired for not handling it properly within their due process supporting procedures then that would be new and different but that is not how it is being reported. It is being reported on a couple networks that it was for his statement that the officer would be entitled to due process. A city manager never goes wrong by saying any employee is entitled to due process, while the lawyers guide what that must look like. The fucking officer shoots an unarmed guy point blank due to fuck up and you are trying to quell a potential riot by lynching the black city manager as an offering to the crowd. AHHH, NO. THAT DOG DON'T HUNT.
I reserve the right to change my view if the facts reported change.
Last edited: