Why are some insiders' trades executed in odd lots? For example, I am looking at recent inside trades on 1/6/6 by Jonathan J Rosenberg of Google.com -- he was executed like this:
297 $467.75
200 $467.49
100 $467.44
291 $467.10
20 $467.04
20 $467.03
100 $467.02
160 $467.01
100 $465.50
200 $465.39
291 $465.37
290 $465.10
300 $465.04
591 $462.36
46 $461.75
391 $461.72
154 $461.70
100 $461.17
291 $461.04
200 $460.99
300 $458.09
291 $458.06
291 $457.12
541 $456.86
50 $456.83
300 $456.70
Are these executions attempting to mask his true size and/or exploit some advantage of odd lot executions? Or is it just small sizes on the orderbook? and also, how prevalant is it to use them? I think that sometimes oddlots may not even be printed on the tape. Thanks.
PS - according to Excel's autosum the total size of the shares is 5,915.
297 $467.75
200 $467.49
100 $467.44
291 $467.10
20 $467.04
20 $467.03
100 $467.02
160 $467.01
100 $465.50
200 $465.39
291 $465.37
290 $465.10
300 $465.04
591 $462.36
46 $461.75
391 $461.72
154 $461.70
100 $461.17
291 $461.04
200 $460.99
300 $458.09
291 $458.06
291 $457.12
541 $456.86
50 $456.83
300 $456.70
Are these executions attempting to mask his true size and/or exploit some advantage of odd lot executions? Or is it just small sizes on the orderbook? and also, how prevalant is it to use them? I think that sometimes oddlots may not even be printed on the tape. Thanks.
PS - according to Excel's autosum the total size of the shares is 5,915.