Does it matter? Right wingers have fox, the left has Google. Can't blame the left for having a bigger Juggernaut
Insider Blows Whistle & Exec Reveals Google Plan to Prevent “Trump situation” in 2020
- Thread starter Banjo
- Start date
Does it matter? Right wingers have fox, the left has Google. Can't blame the left for having a bigger Juggernaut
Right now the large tech companies are facing heavier heavier regulation and even the possibility of being broken up. This is why she mentions Elizabeth Warren.
That's a tough question to answer. I don't want Russia or any other foreign entity interfering with our elections. I also don't want Google & Facebook using left leaning algorithms to try to influence our elections. In theory they may have the legal right to do so, but it's highly unethical since they all claim to be politically unbiased. I just want to call a spade a spade. If you're pushing a liberal message, admit it to the public.
That's a tough question to answer. I don't want Russia or any other foreign entity interfering with our elections. I also don't want Google & Facebook using left leaning algorithms to try to influence our elections. In theory they may have the legal right to do so, but it's highly unethical since they all claim to be politically unbiased. I just want to call a spade a spade. If you're pushing a liberal message, admit it to the public.
I don't have a problem with ethics anymore. Trump took care of that
Clearly she was talking about the all important fiscal year ends....DUH?
Nominated for the stupidest post of all time.
You mad fox is puny compared to google? Yeah, you mad
Leaked Google email:
Today it is often 1 or 2 steps to the nazis, if we understand that PragerU, Jordan Peterson, Ben Shapiro et al are nazis using the dog whistles you mention in step 1. I can receive these recommendations regardless of the content o fwhat I'm looking at, and I have recorded thousands of internet users sharing the same experience. I don't think correctly identifying far-right content is beyond our capabilities. But if it is, why not go with Meredith's suggestion of disabling the suggestions feature? This could be a significant step in terms of user trust.
Today it is often 1 or 2 steps to the nazis, if we understand that PragerU, Jordan Peterson, Ben Shapiro et al are nazis using the dog whistles you mention in step 1. I can receive these recommendations regardless of the content o fwhat I'm looking at, and I have recorded thousands of internet users sharing the same experience. I don't think correctly identifying far-right content is beyond our capabilities. But if it is, why not go with Meredith's suggestion of disabling the suggestions feature? This could be a significant step in terms of user trust.
Leaked Google email:
Today it is often 1 or 2 steps to the nazis, if we understand that PragerU, Jordan Peterson, Ben Shapiro et al are nazis using the dog whistles you mention in step 1. I can receive these recommendations regardless of the content o fwhat I'm looking at, and I have recorded thousands of internet users sharing the same experience. I don't think correctly identifying far-right content is beyond our capabilities. But if it is, why not go with Meredith's suggestion of disabling the suggestions feature? This could be a significant step in terms of user trust.
So they're discussing the algo needs improvement? Sounds like good customer service.