Inside Boolean Algebra.

Quote from Kurgan:

Thanks Jack for your support.This simple task assigned to me was done by you,and assembled by me.At least we have a conception now,what the basis of the market is(in theory).Now,if you don`t mind a little practice?Knock...knock...May i come in?
More...

At this point for building your mind you are following rules you built to make 50 copies of what you are looking at. Post each copy you make with the number on it.

for thinkng practice, do the tasks below.

draw up the system of the cycle scoring using the functions, operators and indicators of the the three variable system.

draw up the rules on the one pager using the functions, operators and indicators of this one variable system.

when you get both systems done we will code them up so every one can have an ATS or two that delivers @ a Sharpe Ratio of over 60.

Use my prior references for the function list, the operator list and the indicators list.
 
Column 1 (Price variable), column 2 (Volume variable), column 3 (A/D variable), column 4 (Score).

1 1 1 7 (Three concurrent changes in variables)
1 1 0 6

1 0 1 5 (Two concurrent changes in variables)
1 0 0 4

0 1 1 3 (Three concurrent changes in variables)
0 1 0 2

0 0 1 1 (Two concurrent changes in variables)
0 0 0 0

Note: For score 7 and 3, both volume and A/D are INCREASING. For score 5 and 1, only A/D is INCREASING. I wonder why nobody has asked how to measure A/D, lol.

Side note: I dislike the misleading term A/D for years. Dominance/Non-dominance is better. :D A/D should be the gerund of market phenomena in particular the nesting fractals. I feel that the scores could be hard to read if slower fractal's cycles are "volatile".
 
Quote from Paddler:

Column 1 (Price variable), column 2 (Volume variable), column 3 (A/D variable), column 4 (Score).

1 1 1 7 (Three concurrent changes in variables)
1 1 0 6

1 0 1 5 (Two concurrent changes in variables)
1 0 0 4

0 1 1 3 (Three concurrent changes in variables)
0 1 0 2

0 0 1 1 (Two concurrent changes in variables)
0 0 0 0

Note: For score 7 and 3, both volume and A/D are INCREASING. For score 5 and 1, only A/D is INCREASING. I wonder why nobody has asked how to measure A/D, lol.

Side note: I dislike the misleading term A/D for years. Dominance/Non-dominance is better. :D A/D should be the gerund of market phenomena in particular the nesting fractals. I feel that the scores could be hard to read if slower fractal's cycles are "volatile".
More...


Thank you for posting the matrix and annotating it.

A/D like most indicators has been around for a long time. different athorities use differing approaches. By thoroughly examining their work it is possible to learn something about this third variable.

Right now we have a market cycle and it is composed of two trends. we also have two methods of trading the trends in cycles.

In both threads that are running their are objections and non-positive opinions on the details of trading and making money in markets.

If you use the resouces I mentioned you can review the various approaches O'Niell and the function compilers at GFTI are using.

WJO'N uses five letters and in the past we used A and B for accumulation and we used C, D and E for distribution. GFTI uses a function and then assigns a go/nogo to the function to have accumulation. The first is 60 and the second is 75 as their respective assignments of a value that serves as a go/nogo.

If it were decided to use 5 or 3 divisions of the possibilites, then the middle portions of each could be assigned WAIT.

A lot of variations are possible. If wait is introduced then the 8 scores would have insertions between each score and 16 elements would exist for the cycle trending differeniation.

My intention was to make it possible for the least trained potential traders to be able to make money ASAP in their careers. there was some comment on how to really make money at a high velocity with the same deep certainty.
 
Quote from Paddler:

Column 1 (Price variable), column 2 (Volume variable), column 3 (A/D variable), column 4 (Score).

1 1 1 7 (Three concurrent changes in variables)
1 1 0 6 (Single change in variables)

0 1 1 5 (Single change in variables)
1 0 0 4 (Two concurrent changes in variables)

0 0 0 3 (Three concurrent changes in variables)
0 0 1 2 (Single change in variables)

1 0 0 1 (Single change in variables)

0 1 1 0 (Two concurrent changes in variables)

Note: For score 7 and 3, both volume and A/D are INCREASING. For score 5 and 1, only A/D is INCREASING. I wonder why nobody has asked how to measure A/D, lol.
More...


I think it rather shoulda been this way,no?
 
Quote from Kurgan:



I think it rather shoulda been this way,no? [/B]
More...

At this point we can chalk up your particpation as just a very bad scene.

There is a cut off in participation at some rather simple level.

read both of Tufte's books to see how the senses and the mind interrelate with respect to information processing. You are unable to look at something and see what the illustration has to offer.

you were unable to begin.

finally, I think that since you cannot change from a base that is not common to the base you are used to, their is no way others or anyone could support your acquiring more memory that could be constructive.

ET is in the pits at this point. and your questions are unreal evem if you are trying to just bait others as a revernge orientation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top