The simple consequences of private meetings at an airport tarmac....
Democrats/Liberals should be very ashamed of themselves.
Insanely corrupt, utterly incompetent, pathetically partisan - FBI
- Thread starter LacesOut
- Start date
Democrats/Liberals should be very ashamed of themselves.
COINCIDENCE? Months Of Texts Between Anti-Trump FBI Agents Staffed On Collusion Case Lost In 'Technical Glitch'
Cheriss May/NurPhoto via Getty Images
ByBEN SHAPIRO
@benshapiro
January 22, 2018
3.9k views
The coincidences just keep piling up.
Back in December, we learned that the Robert Mueller special investigation into supposed Russian election collusion with the Trump campaign had relied on the tender ministrations of FBI agents Peter Strzok. Then we learned that Strzok was involved in the Hillary Clinton email investigation, had been involved in launching the Trump investigation, and was staffed on it. Then he was fired after text messages emerged between himself and mistress and co-worker Lisa Page, who was also part of the Trump-Russia probe.
Next, we learned that Strozk texted page on August 15, 2016 regarding Trump: “I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in [deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe’s] office that there's no way he gets elected -- but I'm afraid we can't take that risk. It's like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you're 40…”
That message clearly made it sound like the Trump collusion investigation could be a way of stopping Trump’s candidacy.
Now, we’ve learned that Strzok and Page sent each other messages suggesting they knew before the FBI had even reported to then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch about Clinton that Clinton would be exonerated. On July 1, 2016, Lynch announced that she would do whatever then-FBI Director James Comey wanted her to do; that announcement followed a tarmac meeting in Arizona between Lynch and Bill Clinton. Strzok texted Page, “Timing looks like hell.”
Page responded, “It’s a real profile in couragw [sic], since she knows no charges will be brought.”
That sounds an awful lot like the DOJ and the FBI working hand-in-glove to protect Clinton.
And the coincidences don’t stop there. In the most insane coincidence of all, Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) announced on Monday that the FBI had somehow failed to deliver months of texts between Strzok and Page – texts beginning December 14, 2016 and ending May 17, 2017, the exact date Mueller was appointed to head the investigation. The DOJ says the texts were lost due to a “technical glitch.” How odd.
This led Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) to call again for a second special counsel to investigate the first special counsel investigation:
First the IRS destroyed emails pivotal to our investigation of their political targeting.
Now the FBI "failed to preserve" texts between Peter Strzok & Lisa Page following the '16 election.
The time for a second special counsel is now.https://t.co/BonrBlsJsB
— Rep. Jim Jordan (@Jim_Jordan) January 21, 2018
The coincidences here are too significant to be ignored. Jordan’s call for a second special counsel is looking better and better.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/26162/coincidence-months-texts-between-anti-trump-fbi-ben-shapiro
It is likely that all texts are stored on cellphone carrier and National Security Agency servers as a part of anti-terrorism intelligence gathering.
we have precedent - its called your right to due process under our constitution.
When prosecutors mishandle evidence, the cases sometimes cases get dismissed after motions by the defendant or even by the judge him or herself.
In this case there is already so much evidence of an illegal and potentially criminal plot to stop Trump, there is a strong chance missing texts which might be related to a plan to frame Trump should get the case dismissed.
No real judge would believe the FBI just lost these texts by mistake.
Frankly, just making that excuse should lead to a criminal investigation.
its preposterous.
When prosecutors mishandle evidence, the cases sometimes cases get dismissed after motions by the defendant or even by the judge him or herself.
In this case there is already so much evidence of an illegal and potentially criminal plot to stop Trump, there is a strong chance missing texts which might be related to a plan to frame Trump should get the case dismissed.
No real judge would believe the FBI just lost these texts by mistake.
Frankly, just making that excuse should lead to a criminal investigation.
its preposterous.
Last edited:
you are correct....
When the FBI would rather sabatoge and jeopardize Muellers ability to win at trial than release texts....
you know it is very very incriminating.
I thought about this some more.
Losing those texts should result in a instant dismissal of any case against Trump and the people in his family. We can't let the FBI set a precedent for law enforcement and govt entities to keep losing data.
Hillary lost data and bleech bit her hard drive.
The dnc the same thing
the IRS lost data too if I recall
now the FBI...
What the hell is going on? Imagine how corrupt they would have gotten after 4 more years of hillary... allowing them to sweep all that away. The republicans better step it up on this memo and these investigations.
When the FBI would rather sabatoge and jeopardize Muellers ability to win at trial than release texts....
you know it is very very incriminating.
I thought about this some more.
Losing those texts should result in a instant dismissal of any case against Trump and the people in his family. We can't let the FBI set a precedent for law enforcement and govt entities to keep losing data.
Hillary lost data and bleech bit her hard drive.
The dnc the same thing
the IRS lost data too if I recall
now the FBI...
What the hell is going on? Imagine how corrupt they would have gotten after 4 more years of hillary... allowing them to sweep all that away. The republicans better step it up on this memo and these investigations.
Absolutely.
If a law enforcement agency fails to maintain the records that are required by law and prudent practice- records that are normally relied upon to provide either confirming or exculpatory information in the normal course of litigation- then both the judge and/or jury are entitled to give considerably weight to that in their decisionmaking. They are also entitled to probe it further too. If the FBI top brass says they did not have backup, how about other agents or divisions? Was their Samsung a problem there too. The Inspector General is required to report to Congress that his agency has adequate record-keeping practices and rules and that all employees are aware of them and that the practices are audited. What does his report show when they assert that they knew nothing and never checked up on whether they were actually being preserved.
You know - by way of example- it is common practice to cross examine a police officer based on their reports and notes and communications after an incident. If they are being sued or a defendant is trying to contest them and the police department just says "oh we don't have that stuff" .....well....I will just repeat myself.....not off to a good start and the judge and jury are absolutely entitled to give weight to that.
Also, since I have done it many, many times over here, I am not going to repeat in detail that Mueller and Weissman have lost many, many cases on appeal and they tend to have lots of ballsy fun until an actual trial occurs and an actual defense team shows up. But for those who want to look into it further, just go back and see how many YUGE cases he lost for failure to turn over exculpatory evidence to the defense teams.
Last edited:
In various financial services industries, poor record keeping is illegal and if it’s a licensed licensed, could cost the business its license.
Lost FBI Texts Could Form Basis for Motion to Dismiss in Trump Team Fight Against Russia Probe.
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profil...iss-in-trump-team-fight-against-russia-probe/
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profil...iss-in-trump-team-fight-against-russia-probe/
KGB rule number one:
You always, always, have a big file and in detail about what the people you are investigating have done or anything that you wish to make up and put into the file.
KGB rule number two:
There is no file on anything you might have done.