If reports are correct, two women, who possibly could be CIA or Mossad assets, but are more likely to be gullible young women indoctrinated by feminist propaganda rampant in Scandinavia, have brought sex charges against Assange. One claims that she was having consensual sexual intercourse with him, but that he didnât stop when she asked him to when the condom broke.
Think about this for a minute. Other than male porn stars who are bored with it all, how many men can stop at the point of orgasm or when approaching orgasm? How does anyone know where Assange was in the process of the sex act? In a healthy society, women would be competing for the sperm of high IQ men such as Assange. Perhaps he thought he was doing them a favor by attempting to pass on his genes.
Would a real government that had any integrity and commitment to truth try to blacken the name of the prime truth teller of our time on the basis of such flimsy charges? Obviously, Sweden has become another two-bit punk puppet government of the US.
Joe Lieberman from Connecticut, who is Israel’s most influential senator in the US Senate, delivered sufficiently credible threats to Amazon to cause the company to <a href="http://news.antiwar.com/2010/12/01/facing-lieberman-boycott-amazon-ousts-wikileaks/">oust WikiLeaks content from their hosting service</a>.
The US government has got away with telling lies for so long that it no longer hesitates to lie in the most blatant way. WikiLeaks released a US classified document signed by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that explicitly orders US diplomats to spy on UN Security Council officials and on the Secretary General of the United Nations. The cable is now in the public record. No one challenges its authenticity. Yet, today the Obama regime, precisely White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, declared that Hillary had never ordered or even asked US officials to spy on UN officials.
Anyone who believes the US government about anything is the epitome of gullibility.
Who, Precisely, Is Attacking the World?
by Paul Craig Roberts, December 01, 2010
The stuck pigs are squealing. To shift the onus from the U.S. State Department, Hillary Clinton paints WikiLeaksâ release of the âdiplomatic cablesâ as an âattack on the international community.â To reveal truth is equivalent, in the eyes of the U.S. government, to an attack on the world.
It is WikiLeaksâ fault that all those U.S. diplomats wrote a quarter of a million undiplomatic messages about Americaâs allies, a.k.a. puppet states. It is also WikiLeaksâ fault that a member of the U.S. government could no longer stomach the cynical ways in which the U.S. government manipulates foreign governments to serve, not their own people, but American interests, and delivered the incriminating evidence to WikiLeaks.
The U.S. government actually thinks that it was WikiLeaksâ patriotic duty to return the evidence and to identify the leaker. After all, we mustnât let the rest of the world find out what we are up to. They might stop believing our lies.
The influential German magazine Der Spiegel writes: âIt is nothing short of a political meltdown for U.S. foreign policy.â
This might be more a hope than a reality. The âSoviet threatâ during the second half of the 20th century enabled U.S. governments to create institutions that subordinated the interests of other countries to those of the U.S. government. After decades of following U.S. leadership, European âleadersâ know no other way to act. Finding out that the boss badmouths and deceives them is unlikely to light a spirit of independence. At least not until Americaâs economic collapse becomes more noticeable.
The question is: how much will the press tell us about the documents? Spiegel itself has said that the magazine is permitting the U.S. government to censor, at least in part, what it prints about the leaked material. Most likely, this means the public will not learn the content of the 4,330 documents that âare so explosive that they are labeled âNOFORN,ââ meaning that foreigners, including presidents, prime ministers, and security services that share information with the CIA are not permitted to read the documents. Possibly, also, the content of the 16,652 cables classified as âsecretâ will not be revealed to the public.
Most likely the press, considering their readersâ interests, will focus on gossip and the unflattering remarks Americans made about their foreign counterparts. It will be good for laughs. Also, the U.S. government will attempt to focus the media in ways that advance U.S. policies.
Indeed, it has already begun. On Nov. 29, National Public Radio emphasized that the cables showed that Iran was isolated even in the Muslim world, making it easier for the Israelis and Americans to attack. The leaked cables reveal that the president of Egypt, an American puppet, hates Iran, and the Saudi Arabian government has been long urging the U.S. government to attack Iran. In other words, Iran is so dangerous to the world that even its co-religionists want Iran wiped off the face of the earth.
NPR presented several nonobjective âIranian expertsâ who denigrated Iran and its leadership and declared that the U.S. government, by resisting its Middle Eastern alliesâ call for bombing Iran, was the moderate in the picture. The fact that President George W. Bush declared Iran to be a member of âthe axis of evilâ and threatened repeatedly to attack Iran and that President Obama has continued the threats â Adm. Michael Mullen, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, has just reiterated that the U.S. hasnât taken the attack option off the table â are not regarded by American âIran expertsâ as indications of anything other than American moderation.
Somehow it did not come across the NPR newscast that it is not Iran but Israel that routinely slaughters civilians in Lebanon, Gaza, and the West Bank, and that it is not Iran but the U.S. and its NATO mercenaries who slaughter civilians in Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, and Pakistan.
Iran has not invaded any of its neighbors, but the Americans are invading countries halfway around the globe.
The âIranian expertsâ treated the Saudi and Egyptian rulersâ hatred of Iran as a vindication of the U.S. and Israeli governmentsâ demonization of Iran. Not a single âIranian expertâ was capable of pointing out that the tyrants who rule Egypt and Saudi Arabia fear Iran because the Iranian government represents the interests of Muslims, and the Saudi and Egyptian governments represent the interests of the Americans.
Think what it must feel like to be a tyrant suppressing the aspirations of your own people in order to serve the hegemony of a foreign country, while a nearby Muslim government strives to protect its peopleâs independence from foreign hegemony.
Undoubtedly, the tyrants become very anxious. What if their oppressed subjects get ideas? Little wonder the Saudi and Egyptian rulers want the Americans to eliminate the independent-minded country that is a bad example for Egyptian and Saudi subjects.
As long as the dollar has enough value that it can be used to purchase foreign governments, information damaging to the U.S. government is unlikely to have much affect. As Alain of Lille said a long time ago, âMoney is all.â
http://www.lewrockwell.com/roberts/roberts285.html
Think about this for a minute. Other than male porn stars who are bored with it all, how many men can stop at the point of orgasm or when approaching orgasm? How does anyone know where Assange was in the process of the sex act? In a healthy society, women would be competing for the sperm of high IQ men such as Assange. Perhaps he thought he was doing them a favor by attempting to pass on his genes.
Would a real government that had any integrity and commitment to truth try to blacken the name of the prime truth teller of our time on the basis of such flimsy charges? Obviously, Sweden has become another two-bit punk puppet government of the US.
Joe Lieberman from Connecticut, who is Israel’s most influential senator in the US Senate, delivered sufficiently credible threats to Amazon to cause the company to <a href="http://news.antiwar.com/2010/12/01/facing-lieberman-boycott-amazon-ousts-wikileaks/">oust WikiLeaks content from their hosting service</a>.
The US government has got away with telling lies for so long that it no longer hesitates to lie in the most blatant way. WikiLeaks released a US classified document signed by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that explicitly orders US diplomats to spy on UN Security Council officials and on the Secretary General of the United Nations. The cable is now in the public record. No one challenges its authenticity. Yet, today the Obama regime, precisely White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, declared that Hillary had never ordered or even asked US officials to spy on UN officials.
Anyone who believes the US government about anything is the epitome of gullibility.
Who, Precisely, Is Attacking the World?
by Paul Craig Roberts, December 01, 2010
The stuck pigs are squealing. To shift the onus from the U.S. State Department, Hillary Clinton paints WikiLeaksâ release of the âdiplomatic cablesâ as an âattack on the international community.â To reveal truth is equivalent, in the eyes of the U.S. government, to an attack on the world.
It is WikiLeaksâ fault that all those U.S. diplomats wrote a quarter of a million undiplomatic messages about Americaâs allies, a.k.a. puppet states. It is also WikiLeaksâ fault that a member of the U.S. government could no longer stomach the cynical ways in which the U.S. government manipulates foreign governments to serve, not their own people, but American interests, and delivered the incriminating evidence to WikiLeaks.
The U.S. government actually thinks that it was WikiLeaksâ patriotic duty to return the evidence and to identify the leaker. After all, we mustnât let the rest of the world find out what we are up to. They might stop believing our lies.
The influential German magazine Der Spiegel writes: âIt is nothing short of a political meltdown for U.S. foreign policy.â
This might be more a hope than a reality. The âSoviet threatâ during the second half of the 20th century enabled U.S. governments to create institutions that subordinated the interests of other countries to those of the U.S. government. After decades of following U.S. leadership, European âleadersâ know no other way to act. Finding out that the boss badmouths and deceives them is unlikely to light a spirit of independence. At least not until Americaâs economic collapse becomes more noticeable.
The question is: how much will the press tell us about the documents? Spiegel itself has said that the magazine is permitting the U.S. government to censor, at least in part, what it prints about the leaked material. Most likely, this means the public will not learn the content of the 4,330 documents that âare so explosive that they are labeled âNOFORN,ââ meaning that foreigners, including presidents, prime ministers, and security services that share information with the CIA are not permitted to read the documents. Possibly, also, the content of the 16,652 cables classified as âsecretâ will not be revealed to the public.
Most likely the press, considering their readersâ interests, will focus on gossip and the unflattering remarks Americans made about their foreign counterparts. It will be good for laughs. Also, the U.S. government will attempt to focus the media in ways that advance U.S. policies.
Indeed, it has already begun. On Nov. 29, National Public Radio emphasized that the cables showed that Iran was isolated even in the Muslim world, making it easier for the Israelis and Americans to attack. The leaked cables reveal that the president of Egypt, an American puppet, hates Iran, and the Saudi Arabian government has been long urging the U.S. government to attack Iran. In other words, Iran is so dangerous to the world that even its co-religionists want Iran wiped off the face of the earth.
NPR presented several nonobjective âIranian expertsâ who denigrated Iran and its leadership and declared that the U.S. government, by resisting its Middle Eastern alliesâ call for bombing Iran, was the moderate in the picture. The fact that President George W. Bush declared Iran to be a member of âthe axis of evilâ and threatened repeatedly to attack Iran and that President Obama has continued the threats â Adm. Michael Mullen, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, has just reiterated that the U.S. hasnât taken the attack option off the table â are not regarded by American âIran expertsâ as indications of anything other than American moderation.
Somehow it did not come across the NPR newscast that it is not Iran but Israel that routinely slaughters civilians in Lebanon, Gaza, and the West Bank, and that it is not Iran but the U.S. and its NATO mercenaries who slaughter civilians in Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, and Pakistan.
Iran has not invaded any of its neighbors, but the Americans are invading countries halfway around the globe.
The âIranian expertsâ treated the Saudi and Egyptian rulersâ hatred of Iran as a vindication of the U.S. and Israeli governmentsâ demonization of Iran. Not a single âIranian expertâ was capable of pointing out that the tyrants who rule Egypt and Saudi Arabia fear Iran because the Iranian government represents the interests of Muslims, and the Saudi and Egyptian governments represent the interests of the Americans.
Think what it must feel like to be a tyrant suppressing the aspirations of your own people in order to serve the hegemony of a foreign country, while a nearby Muslim government strives to protect its peopleâs independence from foreign hegemony.
Undoubtedly, the tyrants become very anxious. What if their oppressed subjects get ideas? Little wonder the Saudi and Egyptian rulers want the Americans to eliminate the independent-minded country that is a bad example for Egyptian and Saudi subjects.
As long as the dollar has enough value that it can be used to purchase foreign governments, information damaging to the U.S. government is unlikely to have much affect. As Alain of Lille said a long time ago, âMoney is all.â
http://www.lewrockwell.com/roberts/roberts285.html
