Alright... point #1. Your defending them fine. You've made it clear to everyone reading that you support them and there marketing practices. Did you know that the FOUNDER of Innovative Trading, was not a profitable trader, and at the time the firm was founded he wasn't a full time trader, but a trainer.
Did you know his partner who owned the firm that it was started in, almost shut it down a few times, had no volume in the office, was clearing trades on a per ticket basis, and has computers that are over three years old as the norm. Those are the facts. You say I missed the boat, but when you see something that reminds you of the Titanic, the smart money is missing the boat.
Now, I can see that you have a deep relationship with them with a lot of money invested in them. Did you know that if you had the volume and a private office like you said, you could actually get cheaper rates by bypassing them and going directly to the clearing firm, I mean if you are a profitable office with volume, but then again we've already determined your a shill recruiting on the site. The old firm cleared through US Trading, which last year didn't even offer them a per share basis for clearing.
This is a thread about Innovative, not Bright, not Echo, not any other firm. You have problems with those firms, you post in those threads to educate and offer your opinion to people who are interested. And you've done this, along with saying something like, "I can get you trading for less than $25k, plus give you backing," either your stupid or you work for Innovative and your "marketing", cause who in the world would offer to back a trader that they've seen two posts on EliteTrader. If your really doing that you should start a thread... you'll become huge, everyone would be willing to loose money for you. But my guess is your doing the good old bait and switch.
But it doesn't seem you can take the heat, because your resorting to swearing, back-tracking, and ignoring the clear statement that Innovative Trading uses unethical methods to recruit traders.
BAD ETHICS + HIGH COMMISSIONS + CHARGING FOR TRAINING + GETTING A CUT OF COMMISSIONS + LYING ABOUT A SALARY AND AVG RETURNS + RISKING YOUR OWN CAPITAL = Innovative Trading, this formula is truely innovative.
It's great to see some discussion about this, especially from Innovative directly, I mean look at JeffGus's posts all try to recruit or dog other firms. I choose to stick with what I know, Innovative Trading, where someone is sure to make money, just not always you.