Quote from NihabaAshi:
Yeah...nothing wrong with volume analysis.
If someone needs it to make consistent profits...
Keep using it.
However, there are some profitable PA traders that don't need it because they can see the volume in the price itself without the inputs.
Simply, some need inputs to see it while others can see the same information without the inputs.
I've used volume in the past...
Works great.
However, I no longer need it because I have a better understanding of the price action today in comparison to the past.
Yet, undeniable, the prior volume knowledge had a positive impact in that today I don't need it on my charts.
Further, in contrast, my experience is different from yours in that most (not all) of the PA + Volume users at ET are the ones that do the belittling and pretend it's the ONLY way to make consistent profits.
Analogy - Some toys require batteries...
Some don't.
![]()
Mark
Quote from saturnine:
I don't remember where, but I distinctly remember someone making an interesting analogy about using volume as a method of price forecast as being equivalent to attempting to use the number of cars on the road to predict the next turn in said road.
It stuck with me because I realized at that point that I never really had a good reason to believe volume meant anything in the way of predictive ability. Thoughts for or against this? I'm open to arguments, but I felt the above was as good as any I've ever heard....
Quote from ProfLogic:
Price and volume are the strongest & perfectly constant variables in any tradeable market.
Price because it is a perfect reflection of what people are willing to pay, at any given moment, for whatever product they are vying for in a typical auction environment like the Markets.
Volume because it is a perfect relection of the amount of buying or selling at that price, at any given moment, for whatever product they are vying for in a typical auction environment like the Markets.
It isn't that volume, by itself, is a way to predict the price direction or the strength on any chart but these two items are the stable foundation of all technical analysis because they lack any variable nature to their existence.
The person that made the analogy regarding the number of cars on the road and the turns on the road has no grasp of the Market environment. It sounds good but a vehicle's primary purpose is not as a tradeable instrument and the turns are fixed actions created outside that specific environment. That person would make a good spin master for the financial crisis we are in though.
Quote from saturnine:
What I mean to indicate is, it seems to me that volume represents how many people, or at least how much people are willing to buy and sell at that moment. However, since each sell requires an equal and opposite buy, what does one use the volume figure for? What is its purpose? How does it speak to you? Any examples of how when coupled with anything else, it increases predictive force?
As we've seen in th last couple of weeks, big moves can occur from relatively low volume, so it certainly isn't a requirement to make a market interesting to trade so long as there is enough liquidity.
Quote from Preacher Man:
FFS... what is your problem..??
We've got a person here whose stated reason for posting is to save other from having to learn the hard way.
Quote from saturnine:
I don't remember where, but I distinctly remember someone making an interesting analogy about using volume as a method of price forecast as being equivalent to attempting to use the number of cars on the road to predict the next turn in said road.
It stuck with me because I realized at that point that I never really had a good reason to believe volume meant anything in the way of predictive ability. Thoughts for or against this? I'm open to arguments, but I felt the above was as good as any I've ever heard....