I was looking at your thread title
"Indicators are liars! Support and Resistance Trading for the S&P emini "
Although I am well aware that newbies chase after indicators as the Holy Grail, I have seen quite a few different works that evidences little value of using indicators based on their classical definitions (especially after factoring in trading costs).
I had been interested in support & resistance about 5 years ago, and starting reviewing someone's work (call it an "S&R advisory"), but turns out his calls based on S&R did not have a positive expectancy. When challenged on this (he would leave losing trades out of his track record and puff up winers at times), he became a wounded creature, as if his honesty had been challenged. I noticed his forum shrivelled up and his track record was usually non-updated for as much as 18 months. I am not publishing his website here, but if you (the OP) are interested, I will PM - will not PM it to others, so please do not ask. As I said, S&R based on his use did not show value. Does not mean other approaches using it work or do not work.
So anyway, the title of this thread presumes that S&R is to be preferred over indicators. Have you ever done any serious statistical testing on S&R and demonstrated to yourself that S&R has a positive expectancy, or have you just published the daily numbers?
I always considered S&R as more of something to control stoplosses/profit targets, rather than as a trading method itself. But I have never seen any objective insitutional analysis that showed value or non-value of S&R.
Thanks,
TZ