Quote from davelansing2004:/murray TT
No offense, but Vic was quoting average % change for trends- the most important detail he left out was the dispersion of the data points that make up the average. Why's this important?
If Vic's studies lead him to state that the average intermediate uptrend is a 25% move but the dispersion is +/- 15%, using the average is useless for real-time trading (the spread could be anywhere from 5% to 40%).
==============
Helpful points Dave , probably even more so since trends have a habit of doing better than average;
however something similar [average time, average price %] can be useful for both real time trading & end of day trading.
And would agree with your implication the trend is a friend;
more so than 25%
IF, to use stock indexes/ETF ,IF average uptrend is 25%;
wouldn't want to trade as big or as wide stops if its up 33.3%.[Parabolic stop & reverse principal, not a mechanical use of it]
If to use another realtime example the average bull market uptrend is 3 years, your point is well proved late 1990's,1920's;
but back to realtime /more examples ,mine is proved 1933-36 & today[ES,YM,DIA DOW,SPY] & proved most of JUNE, & realtime.
QQQQ has had 3 uptrend years; but realtime its down about $0.66, down last 6 months, down on 6-6-06.Good downtrend
Could be even more specific/real time but dont care to;
note my comments are concerning indexes, or ETFs,
NOT real estate, tulips , or other markets.
