Quote from syswizard:
Thanks, but you misunderstood me...the statement was two parts: one part indicating I can get the same dollar effect with 1/3 of the number of contracts. The second part was thrown in to show that commissions are 1/3 as well. Now I see why brokers LOVE ETF's and ETF options.
Ok, but it still doesn't make sense. IWM is about 1/10th the size of the RUT so 1 RUT contract is equal to 10 IWM contracts, yet IWM options are about 10 times cheaper than the equivalent RUT, so it all evens out.
Could you give an example?