if you scalp trade you should not have a stop loss - you should have a death stop, in case you die.
few will understand
Few will understand your post written in plain English? That's actually what I've been doing so far.
if you scalp trade you should not have a stop loss - you should have a death stop, in case you die.
few will understand
by ignoring use of stop losses?The purpose of the post and all the backtesting, etc. is to find how to lose in the most mathematically/statistically correct way possible.
by ignoring use of stop losses?
Anyway only forward live testing can answer that.
When you lock in your 1 pt gain, have you studied the occurrences of getting another tick or twoI'm going to enter trades based on market sentiment direction, and then place a limit that is just 1 point above/below where I enter. This will profit me $50/contract.
Thoughts?
What's there to understand?No. By finding an appropriate SL. You must not have understood the post.
When you lock in your 1 pt gain, have you studied the occurrences of getting another tick or two
If you are up a point does the market give you another tick or two before it goes back to breakeven
This alone would increase the return 25-50%
And a "reverse" and a "backfill exit BE or Exit on small loss" also. You have 15% of system, and the easy part at that. All fixable if you realize it.if you scalp trade you should not have a stop loss - you should have a death stop, in case you die.
few will understand
And a "reverse" and a "backfill exit BE or Exit on small loss" also. You have 15% of system, and the easy part at that. All fixable if you realize it.
For the amount of investment and the amount of risk you accept it would not cost to much to hire someone to backtestI couldn't possibly test that without backtesting software.