I can't read the chart properly. Over which time period did you run your backtest(s)?On a 10k account it would retur about 60% based on 1 contract without compounding.
Maybe this is the approach I should take.
There's no way to eliminate risk of ruin completely. Even with a pre determined stop, you can reach pretty steep drawdown on a string of losing consecutive hits.
Instead of waiting an arbitrary amount of seconds to reduce the chance of partial fills messing up your calculations you could also decide to cancel the order after a fixed amount of time, followed by your calculations. As you have then created a stable situation by cancelling a working order you also know your portfolio size with certainty.If each of those fill represent loss, then it's required that the algo waits a few ms to set the target until all reverse lots are accounted for, to make sure the losses history are read correctly, and b/e target is determined accurately.
2020 to ytdI can't read the chart properly. Over which time period did you run your backtest(s)?
Instead of waiting an arbitrary amount of seconds to reduce the chance of partial fills messing up your calculations you could also decide to cancel the order after a fixed amount of time, followed by your calculations. As you have then created a stable situation by cancelling a working order you also know your portfolio size with certainty.
...
WHAT?!??!?????
I thought you were not supposed to post video links? You must have gotten triggered very hard on this one.That's a trigger phrase. Sorry man.
Hobby to you, and then your response...

Ah, a backtest dominated by a strong uptrend. For fun and giggles you could re-run it during the 2007/2008 crisis and see what happens to your "risk of ruin".2020 to ytd
Ah, a backtest dominated by a strong uptrend. For fun and giggles you could re-run it during the 2007/2008 crisis and see what happens to your "risk of ruin".