Increases in CO2 - Causes Cooling

[futurecurrents]

So, let's be clear about this, this is what Anthony Watts says of the shit jem is peddling.

""The claim by the “slayers” is the worst form of science misinterpretation I’ve seen in a long time."

 

[kut2k2]

This from the moron who starts idiotic thread after thread about the Kelly criterion.

I get it ... you don't understand the Kelly criterion therefore you attack it, like a typical fool. Stop projecting your imbecility on me, troll666.

 

[Ricter]

What you got wrong here... is that you used a 25 year old thought that has been pretty much abandoned the last few years. The NASA experiment virtually proves CO2 does absorb some heat energy from the sun in the upper atmosphere and then bounces it back into space. .

which is completely opposite of your quote which says this...

"Carbon dioxide doesn't absorb the energy from the sun, but it does absorb some of the heat energy released from the earth."

That quote should have said, "CO2 doesn't absorb light energy from the sun..." and it would not be in contradiction with anything NASA or Watts published. The coronal mass ejection was "energetic particles". Two different forms of energy.

 

[kut2k2]

That quote should have said, "CO2 doesn't absorb light energy from the sun..." and it would not be in contradiction with anything NASA or Watts published. The coronal mass ejection was "energetic particles". Two different forms of energy.

You're just confusing the poor creationist, who has actually deluded himself into thinking he can understand scientific statements and arguments.

 

[dbphoenix]

Let me guess. Jem is not a farmer.

 

[jem]

The difference between you an the trolls is that you actually read and understand the science.

1. I think the difference between the sentence you wrote and the sentence you now propose could be substantial. The papers and the science on the impact of solar cycle are coming out very frequently now.

2. I am not sure what you think watts is saying... but if follow the conversations through... you see the real issue that have with the slayers is that they seem to think the slayers are saying co2 does not also warm in the lower atmosphere. I do not know if that is the "slayer" position or not. But to me its the science not that matters as illustrated in the graph.

That quote should have said, "CO2 doesn't absorb light energy from the sun..." and it would not be in contradiction with anything NASA or Watts published. The coronal mass ejection was "energetic particles". Two different forms of energy.

 

[jem]

To me this is very strong evidence that co2 cools the earth by bouncing the sun's energy back out into space.

So the question really does additional man made co2 end up on the blanket side or the shield side of the ledger

note the measured spike in IR from co2 during the Sun's coronal mass ejection.

 

[jem]

let me guess, you are trolling on just about every thread I participate in lately. we don't need anymore leftist drone morons... we already have fraudcurrents on these agw threads.
You can stick to being a troll on the banking threads. You can be the dutiful pre fascist and keep arguing that the regional federal reserve banks are not private... even though they are owned by private share holders.

Let me guess. Jem is not a farmer.

 

[dbphoenix]

let me guess, you are trolling on just about every thread I participate in lately. we don't need anymore leftist drone morons... we already have fraudcurrents on these agw threads.

You can stick to being a troll on the banking threads. You can be the dutiful pre fascist and keep arguing that the regional federal reserve banks are not private... even though they are owned by private share holders.

Actually I couldn't care less about the Fed. It's a MacGuffin. But then I don't suffer from your particular variety of OCD.

 

[jem]

Your self importance is your maguffin. There is no need for your worthless interjections into these threads.

Actually I couldn't care less about the Fed. It's a MacGuffin. But then I don't suffer from your particular variety of OCD.