Increases in CO2 - Causes Cooling
- Thread starter jem
- Start date
still waiting for the science that shows man made co2 is causing warming. you see co2 trails change in ocean temps.
"The maximum positive correlation between CO2 and temperature is found for CO2 lagging 11â12 months in relation to global sea surface temperature, 9.5-10 months to global surface air temperature, and about 9 months to global lower troposphere temperature. The correlation between changes in ocean temperatures and atmospheric CO2 is high, but do not explain all observed changes."
See: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.08.008
"The maximum positive correlation between CO2 and temperature is found for CO2 lagging 11â12 months in relation to global sea surface temperature, 9.5-10 months to global surface air temperature, and about 9 months to global lower troposphere temperature. The correlation between changes in ocean temperatures and atmospheric CO2 is high, but do not explain all observed changes."
See: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.08.008
what you don't seem to understand is that we really don't know if our co2 levels are too high because its plant food.
What you also don't seem to admit is that the earth is releasing a ton of co2 and methane and greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.
Most likely because the sun was in a warming cycle.
What you also don't seem to admit is that the earth is releasing a ton of co2 and methane and greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.
Most likely because the sun was in a warming cycle.
Once again the derail and scare tactic from leftist trolls.
why is db... paid to promote ignorance that in this case is harmful.
More importantly, carbon dioxide, as any kid who got a C in high school chemistry can tell you, is colorless, tasteless, non-toxic, non-irritating to the skin, non-carcinogenic, with no known harmful effects of chronic exposure. (Good thing, since we are exposed to it constantly from birth to death.) Furthermore CO2 is essential for plant photosynthesis and the "primary source of carbon in life on Earth" (Wikipedia).Given that CO2 is a gas, it contains no particulates -- solid particles that damage the lungs.
Even if you fervently believe that emitting carbon dioxide will lead to catastrophic global warming, CO2 has nothing -- zero -- to do with the air pollution in Beijing. And it's not a mistake without consequences. China has a serious health problem to address, one that has effects carried past their national boundaries. If Beijing chooses to placate environmentalists by spending money on carbon dioxide mitigation and diverts resources from smokestack scrubbers and automobile pollution controls, the result will be unnecessary suffering, sickness and premature deaths.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2013..._dioxide_doesnt_cause_smog.html#ixzz3ELsUsBOt
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
why is db... paid to promote ignorance that in this case is harmful.
More importantly, carbon dioxide, as any kid who got a C in high school chemistry can tell you, is colorless, tasteless, non-toxic, non-irritating to the skin, non-carcinogenic, with no known harmful effects of chronic exposure. (Good thing, since we are exposed to it constantly from birth to death.) Furthermore CO2 is essential for plant photosynthesis and the "primary source of carbon in life on Earth" (Wikipedia).Given that CO2 is a gas, it contains no particulates -- solid particles that damage the lungs.
Even if you fervently believe that emitting carbon dioxide will lead to catastrophic global warming, CO2 has nothing -- zero -- to do with the air pollution in Beijing. And it's not a mistake without consequences. China has a serious health problem to address, one that has effects carried past their national boundaries. If Beijing chooses to placate environmentalists by spending money on carbon dioxide mitigation and diverts resources from smokestack scrubbers and automobile pollution controls, the result will be unnecessary suffering, sickness and premature deaths.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2013..._dioxide_doesnt_cause_smog.html#ixzz3ELsUsBOt
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
The greater the uncertainty about rising CO2's consequences, both in desireability and magnitude, the greater the need to control its emission (until there is greater certainty). For illustration, suppose it's 50/50 that rising CO2 is good/bad, and 50/50 those outcomes are modest/extreme. That's a 1 in 4 chance its very bad.
If you hear news that substance X is harmful to your health, but the industry creating X says it is not harmful, then you have uncertainty about X. Do you continue to consume X, or do you cut back a bit, at least for now, and try to learn more about it?
Edit: admittedly, when it comes to foods consumed, we've been dragged every which way over the past 40 years.
If you hear news that substance X is harmful to your health, but the industry creating X says it is not harmful, then you have uncertainty about X. Do you continue to consume X, or do you cut back a bit, at least for now, and try to learn more about it?
Edit: admittedly, when it comes to foods consumed, we've been dragged every which way over the past 40 years.
Most likely you are a liar. It's not the sun. We know it's not the sun.
You'll be plant food when you die. Hurry up.
You'll be plant food when you die. Hurry up.
[/quote]what you don't seem to understand is that we really don't know if our co2 levels are too high because its plant food.
What you also don't seem to admit is that the earth is releasing a ton of co2 and methane and greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.
Most likely because the sun was in a warming cycle.
1. If you say we are not sure if adding more co2 causing warming cooling or nothing... but perhaps we should be careful, I agree with you.
2. Just to see if you all are really in for your cause.
I think the first thing we should do is regulate a/c installers.
they should be required to have to pay 70% of their income in taxes to a co2 repair fund... just in case.
Then we should do the same thing with people who leave the US to produce carbon in other countries.
Let me know when you and fraudcurrents sign up for that.
2. Just to see if you all are really in for your cause.
I think the first thing we should do is regulate a/c installers.
they should be required to have to pay 70% of their income in taxes to a co2 repair fund... just in case.
Then we should do the same thing with people who leave the US to produce carbon in other countries.
Let me know when you and fraudcurrents sign up for that.