Incest Embraced by Liberals as "Sexual Diversity"

Your first reaction is this can't be real, but it's actually how they think. Anything is allowed, except not agreeing with them. Then they start foaming at the mouth and go full WWF on you.
 
Last edited:
Germany looked into legalizing this type of shit few years ago:

As I've been facilitation the "confessions" of some 'Mesdam & Ladies', I came across one who fathered a
kid with her own dad, the 'partner' having been played as a cover; and another 'Lady' who has
been 'happily' sleeping regularly with her own full blood brother. Those among the 'western' and
'middle east' one I have facilitated 'confessions'. The astonishing thing is nor the husband, nor
the boyfriends have a clue. Till people confess themselves, one can not know. And not surprisingly,
around the dad's family members, all the 'Ladies' are pressurised to land a guy/ have an official boyfriend/marry. Marrying being a way
to remove any possible suspicion of the monstruosities taking place among these people: the 'Mesdam & Ladies' are all from the same pool of acquaintances among themselves. Their motto is
hide, hide, hide and manipulate, manipulate, manipulate and most importantly the 'honour of the family',
'the honour of the family', 'the honour of the family'. When, after some reall effective "confessing methods", the 'Mesdam and Ladies' free themselves from the bondage of silence by confessing, you simply understand more where 'real Catholic' get it right.

People who are not real Catholic ( and I mean REAL with full and complete regular confessions and
real Religious studies) can easily fall into that, as those who promote fornication know what they are doing and what buttons to push to get people into more depraved activities. And those who are deep into advanced form of sexual depravity, know how to identify those who are into the same stuff, as well as know how to hide to those who are not 'yet' there.
 
Last edited:
Dice is a pretty good reporter with an entertaining knack for telling a story. Usually he makes people appear stupid, like when he tries to give away silver bars or chocolate bars. But in this case, the "liberals" made him look stupid, imo.

First, how does he know these people are liberals? Oh, and what was a liberal again? That's bad, right? Is this the new "pagan"? Remember the "pagan" label? Remember the "gnostic" label? Gnostic are bad don't you know!

Basically, you CAN NOT blindly accept the moralizing of Christians (like Dice) any more you would accept the virtue signalling of nitro (rest his soul) lest the blind lead the blind into a ditch.

Dice is truly lost here, as he starts, like all Christans, with the assumption that some sex is sinful, while some sex is sanctioned and taken for granted ( such as the misogynist apostate Paul's fetish for "marriage bed" sex).

I've got news for you all: ALL sex is sin and there isn't anything normal, from a spiritual perspective, about flesh.

Having said that, watch all Christian combatants come out of the woodwork and attack me as, no, not as a liberal, but as Gnostic. That's BAD...remember?

Sorry fans of the pedantic Paul, whose rantings, called "scripture", you worship.

All f---ing is "fornication". It's all "porn"...all "of the flesh".

For computer programmers, here is the code:

Man = porn
Woman = porn

Neither of these genders is normal, none that are sanctioned by any god that is Good.

Likewise, not a single "race" is better or worse than another.

Nor are transgendered better or better off.

Nothing is normal about "this world" and "the god of this world".

Since the concept of sin is beyond any Christian's ability to judge, the only thing you need to know to start to get your heads straight about this matter is that all sex is rediculous.

Indulge in Paul's prurient pasttime, if you wish, but if for one minute you take it seriously, and/or religiously, you've lost the ability to judge it rightly as rediculous as Monte Python's "silly walk".

Hell is where half the demons want to normalize FORCE, and the other half want to normalize CONSENT, where vocal minority and silent majority battle for mindshare on a battle field that is constantly changing.

I'm on the " consent" side, but I never forget where all sex takes place (in hell), and that it's all rediculous.

To break it down further, i'ld need $60 an hour.
 
It's just... sex... (a simple, necessary bodily need/function/desire) -- it's not like you're getting married or producing a baby together o_Oo_O
I've never done it. -- but I'm not gonna deny I haven't thought about it at one time or another,
 
Last edited:
your view seems to stem from Augustine's belief that everything of the flesh is sin. I see not reason to have faith in that view.

if you don't wish to refer to the bible... you can just try to be in touch with nature and the universe. some sex is transcendent and you know its right. Appetites for sex is no different that food. If you eat food properly its not sinful. I know drinking too much soda is wrong. I don't have be all that in touch to understand that. Most people know when sex is right and when its left - I mean wrong. (sinister joke there - pun intended)

if you wish to look to the bible outside of Paul... God looked at his creation and said it was good. Be fruitful and multiply.



Good1 said:
Dice is a pretty good reporter with an entertaining knack for telling a story. Usually he makes people appear stupid, like when he tries to give away silver bars or chocolate bars. But in this case, the "liberals" made him look stupid, imo.

First, how does he know these people are liberals? Oh, and what was a liberal again? That's bad, right? Is this the new "pagan"? Remember the "pagan" label? Remember the "gnostic" label? Gnostic are bad don't you know!

Basically, you CAN NOT blindly accept the moralizing of Christians (like Dice) any more you would accept the virtue signalling of nitro (rest his soul) lest the blind lead the blind into a ditch.

Dice is truly lost here, as he starts, like all Christans, with the assumption that some sex is sinful, while some sex is sanctioned and taken for granted ( such as the misogynist apostate Paul's fetish for "marriage bed" sex).

I've got news for you all: ALL sex is sin and there isn't anything normal, from a spiritual perspective, about flesh.

Having said that, watch all Christian combatants come out of the woodwork and attack me as, no, not as a liberal, but as Gnostic. That's BAD...remember?

Sorry fans of the pedantic Paul, whose rantings, called "scripture", you worship.

All f---ing is "fornication". It's all "porn"...all "of the flesh".

For computer programmers, here is the code:

Man = porn
Woman = porn

Neither of these genders is normal, none that are sanctioned by any god that is Good.

Likewise, not a single "race" is better or worse than another.

Nor are transgendered better or better off.

Nothing is normal about "this world" and "the god of this world".

Since the concept of sin is beyond any Christian's ability to judge, the only thing you need to know to start to get your heads straight about this matter is that all sex is rediculous.

Indulge in Paul's prurient pasttime, if you wish, but if for one minute you take it seriously, and/or religiously, you've lost the ability to judge it rightly as rediculous as Monte Python's "silly walk".

Hell is where half the demons want to normalize FORCE, and the other half want to normalize CONSENT, where vocal minority and silent majority battle for mindshare on a battle field that is constantly changing.

I'm on the " consent" side, but I never forget where all sex takes place (in hell), and that it's all rediculous.

To break it down further, i'ld need $60 an hour.
More...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top