Inandlong gone?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Quote from Magna:

I am sorry to see Inandlong leave ET as a moderator since he did a very good job, we had many private PM's, and I consider him my friend. As to his differences with Marketsurfer I cannot comment, as I don't know all the ins 'n outs of that discussion. But I don't understand why Romeo starts this thread on Nov 25, then registers under the nom de plume of Silvain Garnea on Nov 26 to repeatedly attack Marketsurfer and defend his friend Inandlong. Surely you could have done that under the Romeo name without creating yet another alias??? :confused:

How about the way he kept starting so many threads on similar mud-slinging topics that modersators actually deleted the threads within a few minutes of his starting many of them (so that many people on ET never fully saw how much of a jerk Rocko is)? Isn't there some way to deal with people like this?
 
Quote from Magna:

I am sorry to see Inandlong leave ET as a moderator since he did a very good job, we had many private PM's, and I consider him my friend. As to his differences with Marketsurfer I cannot comment, as I don't know all the ins 'n outs of that discussion. But I don't understand why Romeo starts this thread on Nov 25, then registers under the nom de plume of Silvain Garnea on Nov 26 to repeatedly attack Marketsurfer and defend his friend Inandlong. Surely you could have done that under the Romeo name without creating yet another alias??? :confused:
:confused:

Why do you assume that I'm Romeo? Are you suggesting that Romeo was Inandlong's only friend on ET, and no one else is capable of coming to his aid? That's a mighty assumption, why don't you look over this thread and you will see that Inandlong has many supporters. But I didn't see YOUR name in the mix, until now. It sure isn't under the "well wishes" category, though.
:confused: :confused:
 
Quote from inandlong:

Your post quoted my post.

Your post quoted my post.

Your post quoted my post.

If you are still having difficulty seeing how I could take your comments personally, most good bookstores probably have self-help sections where you might find some resources on interpersonal communication.

Longshot, please check your mailbox in a few minutes. I am sending you an answer regarding your request.



LOL ! Marketsurfer was debating your post and ideas not attacking you personally. You need to calm down and go back to reread the original post that offended you so much. Marketsurfer actually apologized to you, but you responded with personal attacks and nonsense claims of withholding investment.

I have no idea how you could take a critique of ta and twist it into a personal attack against Marketsurfer.

What a JOKE !

jaCk:confused:
 
Quote from Silvain Garnea:

Why do you assume that I'm Romeo? Are you suggesting that Romeo was Inandlong's only friend on ET, and no one else is capable of coming to his aid? That's a mighty assumption....
I never suggested that Romeo was Inandlong's only friend, never made that mighty assumption. As I respect your ability to make pretty accurate calls regarding the S&P, you should respect my ability to dig below the surface and ferret out who's who on ET. Thanks for being honorable by not lying and denying what we both know to be true.
 
Oh, leave him alone Magna. He might get upset and decide to leave. God knows I get major laughs out that character and would hate to see him go! ("Rocco" is a classic. So transparently "Romeo/Vinny/etc" but a classic nevertheless. His "we Europeans act with class" still has me ROFL. :))
 
Quote from LongShot:

marketsurfer owes inandlong a sincere apology


it was not "owed", but was given freely and immediately since i considered him a trading friend/ brother. i still do not understand how my post on TA offended him personally.

surfer :confused:
 
Quote from marketsurfer:




it was not "owed", but was given freely and immediately since i considered him a trading friend/ brother. i still do not understand how my post on TA offended him personally.

surfer :confused:

it's pretty simple really you dissed IAL. you said how foolish it is for anyone to even consider certain methods & TA, the very same or similar TA methodology successfully utilized by IAL for many many years [i would imagine]. essentially you called him a fool.
 
Quote from LongShot:

it's pretty simple really you dissed IAL. you said how foolish it is for anyone to even consider certain methods & TA, the very same or similar methodology successfully utilized by IAL. essentially you called him a fool.
Quit instigating. You are excellent at it, but save it for someone who deserves it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top