It makes sense that a state is not as sensitive to cuts in the short run as the Feds.
its a curve somewhere along the curve more taxes can increase revenue and somewhere along the curve cutting taxes increases revenue. Since federal taxes are higher... tax cuts are more likely to result in revenue increases. Plus tax cuts don't seem to stop federal spending but states tend to try to balance their budget more so it takes a while for things to compensate or each other.
additionally reaction to state cuts are likely to take a longer time... as business and people can tax shop to some degree ahead of time. so those highly sensitive the cuts might have already moved to lower tax states.
do leftists ever think in systems here... besides ricter.
its a curve somewhere along the curve more taxes can increase revenue and somewhere along the curve cutting taxes increases revenue. Since federal taxes are higher... tax cuts are more likely to result in revenue increases. Plus tax cuts don't seem to stop federal spending but states tend to try to balance their budget more so it takes a while for things to compensate or each other.
additionally reaction to state cuts are likely to take a longer time... as business and people can tax shop to some degree ahead of time. so those highly sensitive the cuts might have already moved to lower tax states.
do leftists ever think in systems here... besides ricter.
Doesn't your comment shake the very foundation of the Reagan Economic Miracle? The one directly supported and vetted by Laffer then, and now in Kansas? If taxes are "too high" right now, doesn't that make it ripe for the Laffer curve to do its magic by raising government revenues as taxes are cut? That is its very premise. If its magic doesn't work even when taxes are "too high" then it's got no game.