You do realize the entire article is about Ludvigsson using fake data in the NEJM article that does not represent the number of sick and dead school-age children in Sweden due to COVID. You are merely quoting his fake data. Scientists and medical researchers are demanding that the NEJM retract his paper and two letters.
Why in the hell would Ludvigsson remove data from his research so that his conclusions would help support those quacks at the Great Barrington Declaration that believe in Natural Herd Immunity ???
I wish there was a way to monitor all those authors to see which one has gotten a Covid vaccination in secrecy like Trump / Melanie did in January and that other guy (can't remember his name) got vaccinated after emails within the White House revealed their belief in Natural Herd Immunity.
Ludvigsson and others like him should be arrested for altering their data or removing critical data to support their research conclusions because that's how misinformation / disinformation gets started.
By the way, its not different than Cuomo did with removing Covid deaths data involving the elderly deaths in New York so that it will fit whatever narrative they wanted.
-------
The complaint comes from Bodil Malmberg, a private citizen in Vårgårda, Sweden. She used the country’s open records law to obtain email correspondence between Ludvigsson and Swedish chief epidemiologist Anders Tegnell, the architect of the country’s pandemic policies, that shed light on how the paper came about. Malmberg says she requested the emails because the data in the NEJM paper “did not add up.” Ludvigsson does not dispute the content of the emails, but stands by the study’s conclusions. However, he says the barrage of criticism and personal attacks has made him decide to quit COVID-19 research.
Ludvigsson, whose prepandemic research focused on gastroenterology, was one of the 47 original signers of the Great Barrington Declaration, a controversial document published in October 2020 that argued that pandemic policies should focus on protecting the vulnerable while the rest of the population builds up immunity through natural infection.
-------
They will never understand that its extremely difficult to protect the vulnerable due to social economic disparities, 1/3 not knowing they have an underlying medical condition, surrounded by those with misinformation about Covid and children / teenagers are excellent carries of Covid back home to their families that have parents / grandparents although children are less likely to become severely ill from Covid.
wrbtrader
Last edited:
