People need to use their brains and put data in context....
a. People died in the 60s all over the world.
Nobody said that Covid did not kill people.
We know it kills the old those with diabetes, overweight, and other pre - existing issues.
Its almost like it was engineered to keep China's health costs down....
but...
if you look at your first chart... you see (as the contributors on this thread have been stating) Sweden had a "pre existing condition" itself... well below average deaths in 2019.
a. So 2020 could be seen a reversion in 2020 with above average deaths... that was bound to happen regardless of Covid. Articles have explained that 2019 in Sweden was a below average year of death for the elderly.
b. Plus... a very outsized proportion of Sweden's death happened very early like NY NJ Spain, Italy Belgium before they formulated their strategy.
So basically without examining how Sweden did once they protected old folks any comparison regarding deaths is beyond useless... its either ignorant or created as propaganda. Why don't we see the world blaming Italy or France or Belgium...
-----
Regarding the people who died in the 60s... this might be a fruitful area to examine.
a. What percentage of the 759 people who died in their 60s have pre-existing conditions and was this really different than other lock down places?
That graph looks very similar to the graphs I have seen from San Diego...
https://www.sandiegouniontribune.co...-coronavirus-in-san-diego-county-demographics
b. I would like to know a few more things...
For instance I would like to know if they were part of a very low natural vitamin did group... that happened to be from the same immigrant group which suffered excess deaths in Sweden. We know this group has dark skin and were fully covered when outdoors and live in tight quarters.
So in short... all over the world in many countries we saw people in their 60s die.
If you wish to blame Sweden...
lets actually compare stats... and be scientific about it.
a. People died in the 60s all over the world.
Nobody said that Covid did not kill people.
We know it kills the old those with diabetes, overweight, and other pre - existing issues.
Its almost like it was engineered to keep China's health costs down....
but...
if you look at your first chart... you see (as the contributors on this thread have been stating) Sweden had a "pre existing condition" itself... well below average deaths in 2019.
a. So 2020 could be seen a reversion in 2020 with above average deaths... that was bound to happen regardless of Covid. Articles have explained that 2019 in Sweden was a below average year of death for the elderly.
b. Plus... a very outsized proportion of Sweden's death happened very early like NY NJ Spain, Italy Belgium before they formulated their strategy.
So basically without examining how Sweden did once they protected old folks any comparison regarding deaths is beyond useless... its either ignorant or created as propaganda. Why don't we see the world blaming Italy or France or Belgium...
-----
Regarding the people who died in the 60s... this might be a fruitful area to examine.
a. What percentage of the 759 people who died in their 60s have pre-existing conditions and was this really different than other lock down places?
That graph looks very similar to the graphs I have seen from San Diego...
https://www.sandiegouniontribune.co...-coronavirus-in-san-diego-county-demographics
b. I would like to know a few more things...
For instance I would like to know if they were part of a very low natural vitamin did group... that happened to be from the same immigrant group which suffered excess deaths in Sweden. We know this group has dark skin and were fully covered when outdoors and live in tight quarters.
So in short... all over the world in many countries we saw people in their 60s die.
If you wish to blame Sweden...
lets actually compare stats... and be scientific about it.
