In the Coronavirus Fight in Scandinavia, Sweden Stands Apart

The chart I posted showed a clear delineation between Sweden that did not lock down, and the UK that did.

I've posted others that show that mask mandates and lockdown rules had nothing to do with case counts and deaths (at least not when you graph when they were implemented and when the case spikes occurred or the drops occurred).

COVID narrators love to show countries that had success implementing lockdown policy when it furthers their agenda - then its OK to make comparisons. But the moment you post one that doesn't show it, its all about correlations not implying causation or the source is immediately attacked, etc.

So very obvious at this point.

And I showed a clear delineation between Trump being banned from Twitter and Covid deaths dropping dramatically.

So problem solved. The more trump is involved in America the more Covid deaths there are. Trump deniers hate when you post charts that contradict the success of the twitter ban.
 
And I showed a clear delineation between Trump being banned from Twitter and Covid deaths dropping dramatically.

So problem solved. The more trump is involved in America the more Covid deaths there are. Trump deniers hate when you post charts that contradict the success of the twitter ban.

Great, I'm glad you believe those stats are related. You are certainly entitled to your narrative and any belief that this is a valid comparison. Trump being banned from the internet might, in some distant galaxy, have something to do with COVID deaths.

Personally, I prefer my chart where it simply compares the same exact statistics over two countries where one chief disparity is that one locked down rather severely, and one didn't lock down.

If you cannot see the difference between these examples, then you are certainly doing exactly what I accused you of. And that, of course, is your right.
 
Great, I'm glad you believe those stats are related. You are certainly entitled to your narrative and any belief that this is a valid comparison. Trump being banned from the internet might, in some distant galaxy, have something to do with COVID deaths.

Personally, I prefer my chart where it simply compares the same exact statistics over two countries where one chief disparity is that one locked down rather severely, and one didn't lock down.

If you cannot see the difference between these examples, then you are certainly doing exactly what I accused you of. And that, of course, is your right.

Then how do you explain this:

A2A4FE36-9AAB-474E-BBC2-E545A12A6473.jpeg
 
As another very relevant data point to consider in the search for truth.

Too bad you rule out the relevancy or value of such comparison.

Lol. Look I’m not saying country comparisons aren’t interesting but grabbing two charts that look alike to try to claim it proves there’s no difference between “lockdown” and “non-lockdown” does not tell the story because basic compliance with the simple measures of mask, distance, don’t gather will work. If your chart shows anything, it’s that neither country is truly in a “lockdown” state, or at least they do not have compliance with scientifically accepted best practices.

I think you would be best in arguing if a country isn’t going to be in compliance with best Covid prevention practices they might as well “open up.” However, then you would have to look at economic comparisons and that’s as dicey as mortality comparisons because not every country responded to Covid with economic stimulus and relief in the same way.

My opinion is that many countries in Asia are going to show the best outcomes in mortality and economics due to generally high compliance to best practices. We will see in the next year or so.
 
My opinion is that many countries in Asia are going to show the best outcomes in mortality and economics due to generally high compliance to best practices. We will see in the next year or so.

We don't know and I know that I come dangerously close to saying something positive about Americans and other countries (can't have that) but there is the argument that the flu rate this winter has been dramatically lower and can possibly be attributed to people showing some compliant behavior even more the vaccine factor arrived. In other words, the precautions taken against covid have resulted in less flu as well so possibly lots of people have been being good in meaningful numbers.
 
Basically the same...
one country did no masks, no lockdowns...
the rest cumulatively destroyed their respective countries through fascist medical dictatorships...
HOW
IS
THAT
POSSIBLE?

Remember when the fear porn models said Sweden would see 100,000 COVID deaths?
Off by 90,000+

Sweden performed just a poorly economically as the rest of the EU. Sweden performed worse than its neighbors.
 
If true (and this is the first I've seen of that chart) then this is actually a case for not locking down, as the vast majority of the EU's actions have had massive economic consequences, at the benefit of buying them an only nominal/marginal improvement in deaths per million. Back in August, you could have certainly had an argument.

This is your problem (one of them). You continue to look at this as a one variable equation. It isn't, and never has been. There is another side to the conversation you continue to discount and ignore.

Additionally, I note your acceptance of that chart without question or challenge, because it validates your narrative. Were it to show data the other way around, it would have been met with challenges, slandering the source (and the source's author, family, pets) and how we can't use charts like that because of....well, something you would have created.

So Sweden did a TWOFER FAILURE. They managed to both TOTALLY TANK THEIR ECONOMY and HAVE A TREMENDOUS NUMBER OF COVID DEATHS compared to their neighbors. Great job at addressing both variables in the equation and then coming up with the results of massively bad numbers for both.
 
Back
Top