They chased Bari Weiss out of there ... Calling her a Nazi.the New York Times - what a sad joke of a leftist rag it is. Even the lefties can’t respect it these days.
That’s all you need to know.
They chased Bari Weiss out of there ... Calling her a Nazi.the New York Times - what a sad joke of a leftist rag it is. Even the lefties can’t respect it these days.
You have been so wrong about this no wonder you feel the need to cast insults.
Sweden shows this you and your team of scared doomers to be morons.
Scared of data... scared to success without massive government mandated shutdowns.
All you have left is to talk about the deaths that happened early in the crisis before they shutdown old folks homes.
---
Since the Middle of April deaths per day in Sweden have come down so far they are close to zero and they have zero excess deaths.
We should be cautiously celebrating the idea we can be Covid be beaten without shutting down.
Instead you all are doing all you can to bad mouth Sweden.
And what is the alternative...Gavin Newsom's ineffective shutdown.
The one all the lefties were marveling at... because he shutdown so early?
I'm part Danish, we love to badmouth Sweden but not for reasons like this. I'm just badmouthing your hopelessly idiotic and jumbled interpretation of it all.
I don't blame Sweden because of your poor grasp of the situation Jem. They took a chance, it cost many people a horrible lonely unnecessary death relative to the other Nórdics. Vaccines are coming, the world is turning.
It should be obvious to all now that Sweden's no lockdown was the correct approach. They got it over with early and are now set up for long term success. Excellent work Stockholm!.
Sweden did have a few thousand deaths in old folks homes. They should have shut them down sooner and better.
After that their strategy has been great. Lets see how Denmark does going forward after their strong lockdown. I see their active cases are starting to tick up. While Sweden's are trending down hard... almost as if it looks like Covid may be ending for them. We shall see.
That is the risk. Unless you extinguish this virus... you risk a new wave a cases as you exit lockdown.
Back to Jem doing the magical thinking. His lightweight immature fantasy world where you don't have to count your losses as well as your wins. The US would have had a far larger catastrophe with the homes and not in homes elderly doing the same thing at the same time.
Sweden thought they had locked them down but the virus kept getting in. It takes time to perfect a firewall and is much much harder when staff are exposed to a wild spreading population.
You won't soon find anyone who thinks the US would have done better with the possible exception of particularly wealthy retiree places. The rest would have leaked like a sieve.
Now that's not to say Sweden did not do a good jobs protecting other vulnerable who were not in homes. But homes were still just half the deaths. They may have done well there, the report their government has commissioned into the failure of the plan to meet its objective will be interesting. That said, again, the US could be expected to on average do this worse.
Norway and the rest had a much better plan measured to date and as vaccine trials look promising, will achieve immunity without the massive losses.