You really think a website focused on climate change is a proper source for COVID-19 data --- especially when the data does not agree with all the other official sources. Good luck with that.
Much less when the data source on most of the charts is given as - https://tinyurl.com/rnw2fed
Congratulations to Jem on reaching 30,000 postings. --Quite a feat indeed especially in that they are well thought as a rule. Once again, Congrats!
Time to retire. He has officially wasted more of his life than anyone, possibly in the top few time wasters in the world for this kind of forum.
Good thing he was not raising a family in the past 20 years.
that is the problem with you.
you don't understand that science is repeatable.
If you get the data from his source and show his charts to be wrong...
you are doing science.
if you say...hey I don't like because it does not agree with the narrative you prefer...
you are being a moron.
now the recent charts I posted had the source.
Do you have a problem with Johns Hopkins
or
Ourworldindata?
apparently I can see blocked posters when they first post....
It keeps me in the trades longer. When I was making a ton of money trading... that was a good thing. for the last few weeks except for Friday (which was good) it does not matter since my equity has just been bouncing around.
the data source for this chart can be seen at the very top of the chart...
and this chart destroys your argument.
Sweden as many other countries and states like NY lost a ton of old people in the beginning.
You and Your doomers were constantly warning us about how bad things were in Sweden and how they were doomed...
Yet... without a lock down their deaths per 10 million are very similar to many countries who locked down.
![]()
again, dumb guys going to Breitfart fish school to turn (a phrase) all at the same time.Sure. Anyway I have the beginning of a fever today so may not be around to see you reach 60,000. The silver lining of dying from covid-19.