Grob,
I'm an engineer by education so I am no stranger to fractals and Gaussian (not gausian) distributions and curves. I know these scientific terms and have studied the mathematics of them briefly while getting my degree. You still might lose me in the conversation by using these extremely specialized terms in a somewhat of a layman's board.
What I don't understand is why it is you put in so much effort and intelligence into your posts but are unable to find more general (possibly less accurate) words or phrases to describe what you mean. I bet you could have said everything in this last post with crystal clarity for the average trader rather than addressing us as if we are PhD students in Good Will Hunting or A Beautiful Mind.
My point is: it takes a lot of effort to understand you. You can certainly give us a broad stroke of your knowledge in plain colors and when we want to get in the details and accurate terminology, we can ask.
I think this is why you get the response that you do by the majority. The minority who understands it (who knows how much effort they make to decipher it all) seems to want to simply repeat what you say.
Please accept this post as a respectful opinion. My intent is not to draw you out for an argument as you may expect. I sincerely wish to understand you because I believe I can always learn something new. However, reading over your stuff (my intelligence, I have been told, is on the better side of the center of a Gaussian Distribution) I find that it would be very easy to say what you are saying without the "highly specialized" words you use. I'm not asking you to "dumb it down". I'm simply asking you to consider that replacing words like "fractals volume" with "print" and Gaussian with "a normal or probable distribution". That is just a weak example.
With all respect and best regards.
I'm an engineer by education so I am no stranger to fractals and Gaussian (not gausian) distributions and curves. I know these scientific terms and have studied the mathematics of them briefly while getting my degree. You still might lose me in the conversation by using these extremely specialized terms in a somewhat of a layman's board.
What I don't understand is why it is you put in so much effort and intelligence into your posts but are unable to find more general (possibly less accurate) words or phrases to describe what you mean. I bet you could have said everything in this last post with crystal clarity for the average trader rather than addressing us as if we are PhD students in Good Will Hunting or A Beautiful Mind.
My point is: it takes a lot of effort to understand you. You can certainly give us a broad stroke of your knowledge in plain colors and when we want to get in the details and accurate terminology, we can ask.
I think this is why you get the response that you do by the majority. The minority who understands it (who knows how much effort they make to decipher it all) seems to want to simply repeat what you say.
Please accept this post as a respectful opinion. My intent is not to draw you out for an argument as you may expect. I sincerely wish to understand you because I believe I can always learn something new. However, reading over your stuff (my intelligence, I have been told, is on the better side of the center of a Gaussian Distribution) I find that it would be very easy to say what you are saying without the "highly specialized" words you use. I'm not asking you to "dumb it down". I'm simply asking you to consider that replacing words like "fractals volume" with "print" and Gaussian with "a normal or probable distribution". That is just a weak example.
With all respect and best regards.
