Impeachment hearings

[Cuddles]

It seemed that 99% of what we heard today was hearsay, and it wouldn't be admissible in a court of law. Democrats tried to gloss over this fact by making the wild claim that hearsay can be much better evidence than direct evidence. It was an odd way to start the hearings.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1194710194166497281

No crime is needed to impeach a president; an no, I'm not admitting no crime was committed here

The hell does that mean? The American people did not ask for this...Nancy Pelosi did. The American people don't give a flying fuck about the transcript, and the hookers, and the perceived smoking gun that is the WH not providing military aid to some foreign country. The American people want and need blankets. They want and need food. They want and need medical care. And they CERTAINLY need to be castrated, because they are having too many fucking children, just so they can get extra money out of the government WIC program. Bloodsuckers.

They don't care about what is going on with this impeachment shit. They want their free money.

Americans have become some of the dumbest j'mokes in the history of the world because of the addiction to their God-damned social media screens. They are addicted to the sugar of texting texting texting. I just cannot understand it.

And I GREW UP WITH THIS when the tech was breaking barriers! I just do not see the fucking appeal. Use your phone to make a PHONE call. Sorry, am starting to rant. Anyways, carry on.

you are mistaken; plenty of us voted in record numbers to hold a rampant executive accountable. Our only concern is them taking forever to do so.

 

[Black_Cat]

 

[LS1Z28]

No crime is needed to impeach a president; an no, I'm not admitting no crime was committed here.

That's true, but there's no way they'll get the 2/3 super majority they need in the Senate to remove him if they don't prove a crime was committed. Democrats are playing a dangerous game here. They'll increase the odds of Trump winning a second term if this is ultimately unsuccessful.

 

[Cuddles]

That's true, but there's no way they'll get the 2/3 super majority they need in the Senate to remove him if they don't prove a crime was committed. Democrats are playing a dangerous game here. They'll increase the odds of Trump winning a second term if this is ultimately unsuccessful.

Removal will be unsuccessful there's no doubt about it, of that much, we can agree on, regardless if a crime is proven to have been committed.

 

[vanzandt]

Removal will be unsuccessful there's no doubt about it, of that much, we can agree on, regardless if a crime is proven to have been committed.

So why are we wasting our f'ing time when the infrastructure is crumbling and a trip to the Urgent-Care gets billed out at $1300 for a prescription for antibiotics to help with a sore throat?
Because your boy Adam had his feelings hurt?
Its f'ing stupid. Its fraud.

 

[WeToddDid2]

Removal will be unsuccessful there's no doubt about it, of that much, we can agree on, regardless if a crime is proven to have been committed.

Just remember hearsay, according to that one Dem, is tremendously better than direct evidence.

 

[Clubber Lang]

So why are we wasting our f'ing time when the infrastructure is crumbling and a trip to the Urgent-Care gets billed out at $1300 for a prescription for antibiotics

It’s free if you illegally enter the country and go to the ER.

 

[Cuddles]

So why are we wasting our f'ing time when the infrastructure is crumbling and a trip to the Urgent-Care gets billed out at $1300 for a prescription for antibiotics to help with a sore throat?
Because your boy Adam had his feelings hurt?
Its f'ing stupid. Its fraud.

upholding the rule of law even if it's a mirage under this admin

 

[TreeFrogTrader]

That's true, but there's no way they'll get the 2/3 super majority they need in the Senate to remove him if they don't prove a crime was committed. Democrats are playing a dangerous game here. They'll increase the odds of Trump winning a second term if this is ultimately unsuccessful.

Here4Tards said that no crime is necessary, but it works the other way round too, eh? The fact that a crime may have been committed (just accepting that for the sake of argument) does not mean that it is in and of itself a high crime and misdemeanor requiring removal.

Clinton committed a crime, yes? And it is not really up for debate because he plead guilty to it.

 

[Black_Cat]